Citas bibligráficas
Cruzatt, F., (2019). Evaluación del comportamiento de uniones dentadas encoladas, para la fabricación de vigas laminadas con la madera tornillo [Tesis, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14076/20557
Cruzatt, F., Evaluación del comportamiento de uniones dentadas encoladas, para la fabricación de vigas laminadas con la madera tornillo [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería; 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14076/20557
@misc{renati/710944,
title = "Evaluación del comportamiento de uniones dentadas encoladas, para la fabricación de vigas laminadas con la madera tornillo",
author = "Cruzatt Almonacid, Fredy Américo",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería",
year = "2019"
}
The main objective of the study is to evaluate and obtain the values of resistance characteristic of the finger joints of wood Tornillo (Cedrelinga cateniformis D. Ducke), for its use in the manufacture of laminated wooden beams for structural use. They were made 80 specimens with finger joints glued with MUF (Melamine Urea Formaldehyde) were prepared, of which 40 test pieces were tested to static bending at 4 points according to what is indicated by the EN 408 standard and the other 40 specimens were tested with under tension parallel of the fiber following the guidelines indicated by the NBR 7190 standard and the test methodology presented by Mohamad (2011). The characteristic resistance to bending and tensile parallel to the fiber of the finger joints obtained were 38.11 MPa and 35.11 MPa respectively. The characteristic resistance to bending was similar to the minimum bending strength of the finger joints of lamellas (38MPa) found in the EN 14080 standard, while the characteristic resistance to tensile parallel to the fiber exceeded 29 MPa, value assigned to the highest resistant class of the EN 14080 standard. For each test carried out, each of the specimens was classified and characterized by type of failure, in order to evaluate the quality of the bonding of the manufactured joint. In this analysis stage, most of the finger joints produced 100% breakage towood (type 1 failure) and breakage by wood and adhesive (type 2 failure), that is, the gluing worked properly.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons