Citas bibligráficas
Albengrin, M., Diaz, E. (2023). Vulneración Sistemática del Derecho a la Pensión del SCTR por la Conducta Omisiva del Estado [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670162
Albengrin, M., Diaz, E. Vulneración Sistemática del Derecho a la Pensión del SCTR por la Conducta Omisiva del Estado [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670162
@misc{renati/1295570,
title = "Vulneración Sistemática del Derecho a la Pensión del SCTR por la Conducta Omisiva del Estado",
author = "Diaz Arroyo, Eliana Lucia",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
Through Sentence No. 05134-2022-PA/TC, the Constitutional Court warned that the State continues to violate the right to the pension granted by the Complementary Risk Work Insurance, due to the omission of the Ministry of Health and the Social Security Health Insurance in forming enough Medical Disability Evaluating Commissions at the national level, and the absence of medical records and other information that corroborates the certificates issued by said commissions. Thus, to protect the right to a pension, said court reiterated the Unconstitutional State of Affairs due to the omission of the aforementioned entities, requiring them to implement sufficient commissions throughout the country, and established, as binding precedent, new rules to grant the lifetime pension for occupational disease and work accident. In this regard, this work analyzes said ruling through three chapters, beginning by highlighting the most important aspects of the ruling; to then define those concepts relevant to the case based on the applicable regulations and books and magazine articles from Peru and other Latin American countries. Finally, the systematic violation of the right to the aforementioned insurance pension due to the omissive conduct of the State and the response of the Constitutional Court to it is analyzed, concluding that the Unconstitutional State of Affairs is insufficient to confront the state failures and that, although the new rules set as precedent make the requirements demanded of the insured more flexible, they do not encourage the State to improve its policies to guarantee said right; Therefore, certain alternative solutions are suggested.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons