Citas bibligráficas
Esta es una referencia generada automáticamente. Modifíquela de ser necesario
Córdova, J., (2024). Fundamentos jurídicos para la reforma de la prueba nueva en sentido estricto [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/20551
Córdova, J., Fundamentos jurídicos para la reforma de la prueba nueva en sentido estricto [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/20551
@misc{sunedu/3599179,
title = "Fundamentos jurídicos para la reforma de la prueba nueva en sentido estricto",
author = "Córdova Yanayaco, Jhan Carlos",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2024"
}
Título: Fundamentos jurídicos para la reforma de la prueba nueva en sentido estricto
Autor(es): Córdova Yanayaco, Jhan Carlos
Asesor(es): Cruz Vegas, Guillermo Alexander
Palabras clave: Derecho Procesal; Derecho a la Prueba
Campo OCDE: http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Institución: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego
Resumen: El tema de la prueba siempre es relevante en el ámbito del derecho procesal
y en específico en el derecho procesal penal, de ahí que se habla del derecho
a la prueba a la que está muy ligado con el fin del proceso penal que es la
búsqueda de la verdad material: en el contexto del derecho a la prueba se
establece que este derecho de raigambre convencional y que forma parte del
debido proceso se hace efectivo con el derecho a obtener prueba, a
ofrecerlas, de que estas sean admitidas y de que se actúen y se valoren
conforme a las reglas y principios básicos de un Estado de Derecho.
En la investigación que se ha realizado se ha dado respuesta, a partir de las
voces de la doctrina y la jurisprudencia, al tema del ofrecimiento de prueba
nueva en juicio oral, y, en específico, a la prueba nueva que surge con
conocimiento posterior a la oportunidad de presentación (etapa intermedia),
considerando, a partir de los métodos doctrinario y hermenéutico, así como
el análisis del derecho a la prueba, y el análisis del derecho comparado, que
la regulación contenida en el artículo 373 inciso 1 tiene un alcance muy corto,
por cuanto se debe abarcar dentro de regulaciónla prueba que es obtenida
antes de la celebración de la audiencia de control,pero cuando ha precluido
el plazo legal de diez días hábiles para su ofrecimiento en etapa intermedia.
Es por ello, que al final de la investigación se esbozó una propuesta normativa
para completar los alcances de la norma, que, si bien se podría hacer vía
interpretación, por seguridad jurídica y por el principio de legalidad procesal,
es preciso expresamente fijar como regla legal el supuesto de “prueba nueva
en sentido estricto
The issue of proof is always relevant in the field of procedural law and specifically in criminal procedural law, hence the right to proof that isclosely linked to the purpose of criminal process, which is the search for evidence. material truth: in the context of the right to proof, it is established that this conventionally rooted right and that is part of due process is made effective with the right to obtain proof, to offer it, to have it admitted and to act and are valued in accordance with the basic rules and principles of a Rule of Law. In the investigation that has been carried out, a response has been given, based on the voices of doctrine and jurisprudence, to the issue of offering new proof in oral proceedings, and, specifically, to new evidence that arises with knowledge subsequent to the opportunity for presentation (intermediate stage), considering, from the doctrinal and hermeneutical methods, as well as the analysis of the right to evidence, and the analysis of comparative law, that the regulation contained in article 373 paragraph 1 hasa scope very short, since the evidence that is obtained before the control hearing is held must be covered within the regulation, but when the legal termof ten business days for its offer in the intermediate stage has expired. That is why, at the end of the investigation, a normative proposal was outlined to complete the scope of the norm, which, although it could be done via interpretation, for legal certainty and the principle of procedural legality, it is necessary to expressly establish it as a legal rule. the assumption of ""new evidence in the strict sense
The issue of proof is always relevant in the field of procedural law and specifically in criminal procedural law, hence the right to proof that isclosely linked to the purpose of criminal process, which is the search for evidence. material truth: in the context of the right to proof, it is established that this conventionally rooted right and that is part of due process is made effective with the right to obtain proof, to offer it, to have it admitted and to act and are valued in accordance with the basic rules and principles of a Rule of Law. In the investigation that has been carried out, a response has been given, based on the voices of doctrine and jurisprudence, to the issue of offering new proof in oral proceedings, and, specifically, to new evidence that arises with knowledge subsequent to the opportunity for presentation (intermediate stage), considering, from the doctrinal and hermeneutical methods, as well as the analysis of the right to evidence, and the analysis of comparative law, that the regulation contained in article 373 paragraph 1 hasa scope very short, since the evidence that is obtained before the control hearing is held must be covered within the regulation, but when the legal termof ten business days for its offer in the intermediate stage has expired. That is why, at the end of the investigation, a normative proposal was outlined to complete the scope of the norm, which, although it could be done via interpretation, for legal certainty and the principle of procedural legality, it is necessary to expressly establish it as a legal rule. the assumption of ""new evidence in the strict sense
Enlace al repositorio: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/20551
Disciplina académico-profesional: Derecho
Institución que otorga el grado o título: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas
Grado o título: Abogado
Jurado: Ortecho Aguirre De Infante, Rocío Belu; Rincón Martínez, Angela; Albornoz Verde, Miguel
Fecha de registro: 7-feb-2024; 7-feb-2024
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons