Citas bibligráficas
Pese, Y., (2023). La corroboración de la declaración del colaborador eficaz para tener por cierto un determinado hecho en una decisión de prisión preventiva [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24954
Pese, Y., La corroboración de la declaración del colaborador eficaz para tener por cierto un determinado hecho en una decisión de prisión preventiva []. : Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24954
@mastersthesis{sunedu/3456374,
title = "La corroboración de la declaración del colaborador eficaz para tener por cierto un determinado hecho en una decisión de prisión preventiva",
author = "Pese Ruiz, Yurianne Chabelly",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
The purpose of this investigation is to provide some dogmatic criteria of a procedural order to identify the standard of corroboration of the statements of effective collaborators, in order to adopt a decision of preventive detention in the framework of a criminal-democratic process. Under this line of thought, it is intended to explain the historical legislative evolution of effective collaboration, in addition, the concepts and rules of treatment of this special criminal process are defined; as well as the scope of the duty of motivation of judicial decisions by the jurisdictional bodies within the framework of the issuance of the precautionary measure such as preventive detention. Next, some scope of pretrial detention, its methods and systems for evaluating the evidence are explained, to then land on the analysis of the evaluation of the declaration of the applicant for effective collaborator, with the purpose of verifying its foundability or not of preventive detention as the most intense measure, without losing sight of its exceptional application. Finally, it is affirmed that in order to use the statement of the aspiring effective collaborator as an element that justifies the preventive detention measure, it must have a standard of corroboration according to reasonable, minimum and peripheral parameters, and based on the criteria of persistence, coherence, homogeneity and plausibility, analyzed within the same process of effective collaboration.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.