Citas bibligráficas
Del, C., (2023). La entrevista política de televisión en vivo desde la perspectiva del Análisis de la Conversación [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24831
Del, C., La entrevista política de televisión en vivo desde la perspectiva del Análisis de la Conversación []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24831
@mastersthesis{sunedu/3445001,
title = "La entrevista política de televisión en vivo desde la perspectiva del Análisis de la Conversación",
author = "Del Río Villanueva, Carmen Amalia",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
From a normative perspective, live television political interview (LTPI) serves democracy, public debate, and political communication, allowing the audience to access the accountability that the interviewee (IE) carries out when answering to the questions posed by the interviewer (IR), inquiry that she / he performs under professional standards of objectivity and neutrality. From a mundane perspective, is LTPI, in fact, like that? Conversation Analysis, with a strong Anglo-American influence, is the most fruitful sociological field in the study of the mundane LTPI. However, in Peru, neither LTPI as a social phenomenon, nor Conversation Analysis, as a scientific field, have received enough academic attention. Therefore, this thesis has the general aim of establishing —through a literature review— the state of knowledge regarding LTPI. Likewise, it revisits the theoretical and methodological pillars of Conversation Analysis, which inform a Sociology concerned with social order, whose configuration is the product of conversational inter-actions of its members. These ones underlie the existence of a shared social world and the mechanisms that allow them to make sense of it. Findings show a LTPI dual in nature (normative-mundane), one carried out through conversational encounters, where institutionalized, broadcasted, and public talk takes place and consumed in real time. Thus, its concrete manifestations —(not) dissident of the normative standard— can be explained thanks to the structure of the interactional order, one that will be able to account, based on future research, for conversational patterns that shape how people talk about, and make sense of, politics in Peru.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons