Citas bibligráficas
Bonifaz, M., (2021). Heterogeneidad en el desarrollo de la investigación desde la perspectiva institucional e histórica: el caso de cuatro universidades latinoamericanas [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20830
Bonifaz, M., Heterogeneidad en el desarrollo de la investigación desde la perspectiva institucional e histórica: el caso de cuatro universidades latinoamericanas []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20830
@phdthesis{sunedu/3113768,
title = "Heterogeneidad en el desarrollo de la investigación desde la perspectiva institucional e histórica: el caso de cuatro universidades latinoamericanas",
author = "Bonifaz Chirinos, Mónica Patricia",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2021"
}
The current context demands that Latin American universities, or a group of them, assume the responsibility of conducting advanced research that contributes to social and economic development. In this sense, the present thesis aims to study the influences that institutional conditions and historical legacies exert on the development of research in four private universities in Peru, Chile and Colombia. These cases have made significant advances and contributions in research in the period 1998-2017, although analysed in a comparative way they show important differences that merit their study. Supported by the theories of New Institutionalism and Imprinting, the thesis poses as the main hypothesis that historical legacies moderate the effects of institutional pressures on the development of research in each case study. For the empirical analysis, the multiple case study and the method of structured and focused comparison have been used. We used the mixed method approach; the qualitative component is supported by the analysis of theoretical dimensions on 28 interviews, using the AtlasTi v.9.24 software, and the triangulation is carried out through descriptive statistics on a database with the profile and academic production of 1551 professors of the four cases. Findings show that different combinations of institutional conditions influence the development of research; that regulatory mechanisms have less homogenizing effects; that the cognitive-cultural mechanisms are strongly oriented by a market logic and are consistently observable in the four cases, and that the universities imprints have a moderating effect on the development of research. It can be observed that imprints intervene by amplifying or inhibiting the effects of the different institutional conditions, which clarifies the differences in the results of research development.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons