Bibliographic citations
Castañeda, J., (2020). Trascendencia nomotética de las prácticas Parlamentarias y la aplicación del test de democracia Mínima en los plenos del Congreso de la República del Perú, julio 2018 – julio 2019 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/16278
Castañeda, J., Trascendencia nomotética de las prácticas Parlamentarias y la aplicación del test de democracia Mínima en los plenos del Congreso de la República del Perú, julio 2018 – julio 2019 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/16278
@misc{sunedu/2651584,
title = "Trascendencia nomotética de las prácticas Parlamentarias y la aplicación del test de democracia Mínima en los plenos del Congreso de la República del Perú, julio 2018 – julio 2019",
author = "Castañeda Méndez, Juan Alberto",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2020"
}
This research work has the main objective in determining whether the transcendence nomotetica of parliamentary practices allows the application of test of democracy minimal in plenary sessions of the Congress of the Republic of Peru, July 2018 - July 2019. For this purpose we will develop in a timely manner: (i) the binomial of presidentialism and parliamentarism from Latin America, (ii) the transcendence nomotetica of parliamentary practices in a schema parliamentarist, neo and (iii) the 04 criteria of the test of democracy to a minimum. Highlighting as one of the main conclusions; that the test affects the function latent of the arguments that promote parliamentary decisions to assume certain legislative actions and is not an instrument or tool of use for the constitutional Constitutional Courts in order to assess the constitutional and legal persons of a particular draft act, any time the (as) Judges would assume a role to become highly politicised, exercising functions in part of parliamentary nature before a jurisdictional nature.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License