Bibliographic citations
Cornejo, M., (2018). Predicción de la ecografía y otros métodos para la determinación de la fecha probable de parto Hospital Regional Cusco, 2016. [Tesis de segunda especialidad, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1833
Cornejo, M., Predicción de la ecografía y otros métodos para la determinación de la fecha probable de parto Hospital Regional Cusco, 2016. [Tesis de segunda especialidad]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1833
@misc{renati/959143,
title = "Predicción de la ecografía y otros métodos para la determinación de la fecha probable de parto Hospital Regional Cusco, 2016.",
author = "Cornejo Cueva, Magaly",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2018"
}
Entitled research: “PREDICTION OF ULTRASOUND AND OTHER METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE PROBABLE DATE OF BIRTH REGIONAL HOSPITAL CUSCO, 2016 “, had as objective: determine the prediction of the probable date of birth through ultrasound and other methods in pregnant women attending the Regional Hospital of the 2016 Cusco. The applied methodology was: descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study. Results: 56.90% of pregnant women were between 18 and 29 years old; 39.80% of pregnant women had full secondary education; 67.80% is of civil cohabiting status; 47.40% were nulliparous; 34.60% had an average duration of gestation of 39 to 39.6 weeks; the average gestation was 39.6 weeks. It was found that the calculation of the probable date of delivery according to: Naegele formula differs in 52% of the cases in +/- 2 to 10 days; in 29% of cases it presents a difference of +/- 11 to 29 days and only in 19% of cases does it show greater capacity for accurate prediction with 0 to +/- 1 day; according to Wahl's formula it differs in 61% of cases in +/- 2 to 10 days; in 32% of cases it presents a difference of +/- 11 to 29 days and only in 5% of cases it shows greater capacity of accurate prediction with 0 to +/- 1 day, according to the formula of Pinard it differs in 46% of cases in +/- 2 to 10 days; in 38% of cases it presents a difference of +/- 11 to 29 days and only in 13% of cases does it show greater capacity of accurate prediction with 0 to +/- 1 day; according to the Gestogram it differs in 53% of the cases in +/- 2 to 10 days; in 29% of cases it presents a difference of +/- 11 to 29 days and only in 17% of cases it shows greater capacity of accurate prediction with 0 to +/- 1 day and by evaluation ultrasound in pregnant women differs in 48% of cases in +/- 2 to 10 days; in 16% of cases it presents a difference of +/- 11 to 29 days and in 35% of cases it shows greater capacity of accurate prediction with 0 to +/- 1 day. Conclusion: Based on the results the calculation of the due date for Ultrasound assessment in pregnant women attending the Regional Hospital of Cusco, turned out to be having better prediction.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.