Bibliographic citations
Chevarria, D., (2022). La garantía hipotecaria del propietario registral no poseedor de bien inmueble y el derecho del prescribiente declarado judicialmente [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/5150
Chevarria, D., La garantía hipotecaria del propietario registral no poseedor de bien inmueble y el derecho del prescribiente declarado judicialmente []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/5150
@misc{renati/957708,
title = "La garantía hipotecaria del propietario registral no poseedor de bien inmueble y el derecho del prescribiente declarado judicialmente",
author = "Chevarria Alanoca, Diego",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2022"
}
The present investigation has as a general objective, to analyze the implications generated by the mortgage guarantee of the registered owner who does not possess the real estate against the right of the prescribing judicially declared. The specific objectives are related to knowing the opinion of the Real Rights experts of the province of La Convención in Cusco, on the implications generated by the form of resolution of the mortgage guarantee processes of the registered owner who does not possess real estate to the right of the judicially declared prescriptor and specify the Peruvian doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the conflicts of the legal categories: Acquisitive Prescription of Ownership of real estate and Real Estate Mortgage. It was postulated as a hypothesis that: The mortgage guarantee of the registered owner who does not possess real estate has direct implications in the right of the prescribing judicially declared. In the theoretical framework, the theory pertaining to the mortgage guarantee and the purchasing prescription of domain is developed, in Chapter I the general part of the investigation referred to the approach of the problem, general and specific problems, general and specific objectives, was developed in the Chapter II is developed in a theoretical framework in which a search for recent material and of great importance for the investigation was made, taking into account the background, the hypothesis raised, as well as the categories of study that allowed us to know and understand in depth the subject. of the investigation, Chapter III referred to the method used in the present study, we also have chapter IV concerning the thematic development according to the categories of study and pertinent information, finally chapter V in which the results are developed and analysis of the findings. The research is qualitative documentary, the discussion of the results was carried out through legal argumentation based on theoretical and factual data. The hypothesis was validated and the main conclusion was: The mortgage guarantee of the non-possessor registered owner of real estate generates implications directly to the right of the prescribing judicially declared. The mortgage guarantee of the registered owner who does not possess real estate generates implications directly to the right of the prescribing judicially declared.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License