Bibliographic citations
Irribari, A., (2024). Percepciones de la implementación del Modelo de Atención Integral en Salud basado en familia y comunidad en establecimientos de salud de Lima norte del MINSA, 2011 – 2020, desde la perspectiva de los prestadores [Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/16201
Irribari, A., Percepciones de la implementación del Modelo de Atención Integral en Salud basado en familia y comunidad en establecimientos de salud de Lima norte del MINSA, 2011 – 2020, desde la perspectiva de los prestadores []. PE: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/16201
@mastersthesis{renati/911574,
title = "Percepciones de la implementación del Modelo de Atención Integral en Salud basado en familia y comunidad en establecimientos de salud de Lima norte del MINSA, 2011 – 2020, desde la perspectiva de los prestadores",
author = "Irribari Poicon, Angel Omar",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia",
year = "2024"
}
The current health problem in Peru reflects the poor capacity of the health system to resolve and to sustain a care model based on family and community in the face of the health needs of the population, specifically in its healthy but exposed state. at risk or with a present risk, especially at the first level of care. In this sense, the objective of the research was to analyze the perception of the implementation of the Comprehensive Health Care Model based on family and community in level I-3 health establishments of the DIRIS Norte of the MINSA, in the period 2011-2020. , from the perspective of the providers. It is a qualitative study through the application of an in-depth interview, where four level I-3 establishments were selected and doctors, nurses, obstetricians, nursing technicians and community agents were interviewed. The contributions of these key informants allowed us to conclude that, to break the paradigm of curative, intramural, hospital, biomedical care for a MAIS oriented to the prevention of risks and damages and health promotion, extramural, biopsychosocial, the responses were distributed in two directions: some linked them to the issue of the minimum conditions of infrastructure, equipment and human resources, instruments and others, to the deficient competencies in family and community health of health personnel with a marked welfare culture in medical personnel, mainly. Likewise, they pointed out the weak role of the State, specifically the MINSA, DIRIS, other sectors and actors of civil society, especially in addressing the social determinants of health and in the formation of the critical mass for its implementation. Likewise, the constant changes at the political and managerial level in the leadership of the MINSA, moved to the DIRIS and health establishments, preventing the sustainability of the MAIS BFC.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License