Citas bibligráficas
Leiva, L., (2017). Comunicación terapéutica y satisfacción de necesidades del paciente en quimioterapia ambulatoria, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas 2017 [Tesis, Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11818/1234
Leiva, L., Comunicación terapéutica y satisfacción de necesidades del paciente en quimioterapia ambulatoria, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas 2017 [Tesis]. : Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega; 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11818/1234
@misc{renati/861700,
title = "Comunicación terapéutica y satisfacción de necesidades del paciente en quimioterapia ambulatoria, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas 2017",
author = "Leiva Castañeda, Liliana",
publisher = "Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega",
year = "2017"
}
The present study aimed to identify the relationship between therapeutic communication and patient needs satisfaction in outpatient chemotherapy that comes to the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, 2017. The method used was descriptive because it associates the relationship between two Or more variables observed in reality, the research design was correlational cross-sectional, of quantitative type. The study sample consisted of 208 patients undergoing chemotherapy. A research-structured survey was used as a technique, and as a questionnaire a questionnaire validated by construct and expert judgment, the results showed that the therapeutic communication variable is directly and positively related to the patient's needs satisfaction variable, according to the correlation of Spearman of 0.537 represented this result as moderate with a statistical significance of p = 0.001 being less than 0.01. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected. 28.37% of respondents perceived a therapeutic communication of the nursing graduates at a good level, 54.33% perceived a regular level and 17.31% a bad level, 26.44% The interviewees had a high level of satisfaction, 52.88% had an average level and 20.67% had a low level.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons