Citas bibligráficas
Morales, D., (2023). Evaluación de riesgo disergonómico para los colaboradores que realizan actividades administrativas en una empresa constructora [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14076/27271
Morales, D., Evaluación de riesgo disergonómico para los colaboradores que realizan actividades administrativas en una empresa constructora [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14076/27271
@misc{renati/712958,
title = "Evaluación de riesgo disergonómico para los colaboradores que realizan actividades administrativas en una empresa constructora",
author = "Morales Salinas, Denny William",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería",
year = "2023"
}
The present work tries to diagnose and evaluate the “Level of Dysergonomic Risk in Employees Who Perform Administrative Activities in a Construction Company“. The company's business line is the consulting and construction of public works, and its main headquarters are located in the district of Huánuco, province and region of Huánuco. We began with the collection of anthropometric data from 56 collaborators (20 parameters for measuring body segments-ISO 7250 Standard), continued with the measurement of lighting and the determination of the Risk Level for each monitored point (taking into account the Minimum Required Values, established in R.M.375-2008-TR, and the recommended Maximum Proportion, which is established by the American Lighting Society). Likewise, the Dysergonomic Risk Factors for 36 Similar Exposure Groups (GES) were determined and subsequently evaluated using the RULA “Rapid Upper Limb Assessment“ method. From the evaluation using the RULA Method, it was determined that of the 82 postures evaluated (36 GES), 76% have “High Risk Levels“, 16% “Medium Risk Levels“ and only 8% “Low Risk Levels“. This result reflects and reaffirms what has been said above (with regard to the distribution and characteristics of the means of work). Likewise, the dimensions and characteristics of the means of work were assessed for an adjustable parameter, determined by the 5th percentile (women) and the 95th percentile (men).
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons