Bibliographic citations
Masciotti, H., Herrera, G. (2022). Comparación entre radiografías panorámicas y tomografías Cone Beam en reabsorción radicular del segundo molar asociado al tercer molar impactado Arequipa 2022 [Universidad Privada de Huancayo Franklin Roosevelt]. http://repositorio.uroosevelt.edu.pe/handle/20.500.14140/835
Masciotti, H., Herrera, G. Comparación entre radiografías panorámicas y tomografías Cone Beam en reabsorción radicular del segundo molar asociado al tercer molar impactado Arequipa 2022 []. PE: Universidad Privada de Huancayo Franklin Roosevelt; 2022. http://repositorio.uroosevelt.edu.pe/handle/20.500.14140/835
@misc{renati/690815,
title = "Comparación entre radiografías panorámicas y tomografías Cone Beam en reabsorción radicular del segundo molar asociado al tercer molar impactado Arequipa 2022",
author = "Herrera Calumani, Glenny Mashiel",
publisher = "Universidad Privada de Huancayo Franklin Roosevelt",
year = "2022"
}
The research is a cross-sectional study with a descriptive-comparative methodological design. The objective of the research was to compare the diagnosis of external root resorption in second molars associated to impacted third molars in panoramic radiography with Cone beam tomography, conformed with a sample amount of 110 Cone beam computerized tomographies and panoramic radiographies belonging to 110 patients, having been evaluated 276 upper and lower second molars, where the instrument for data collection was validated by experts, the reliability was found by means of the Chi-square study demonstrating the prevalence of root resorption. In the result, the General Hypothesis test shows a significant difference level of 0.003 which, being less than 0.05, the research concluded that there is a significant difference of almost double in diagnoses between panoramic radiographies and cone beam tomographies on the pathology described
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License