Citas bibligráficas
Solano, J., (2022). Implementación de ciclo Deming para optimizar el proceso de homologación de proveedores, en empresa industrial, Lima – 2021 [Universidad Peruana de Las Américas]. http://repositorio.ulasamericas.edu.pe/handle/upa/2092
Solano, J., Implementación de ciclo Deming para optimizar el proceso de homologación de proveedores, en empresa industrial, Lima – 2021 []. PE: Universidad Peruana de Las Américas; 2022. http://repositorio.ulasamericas.edu.pe/handle/upa/2092
@misc{renati/5684,
title = "Implementación de ciclo Deming para optimizar el proceso de homologación de proveedores, en empresa industrial, Lima – 2021",
author = "Solano Ignacio, Jennifer Rossy",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Las Américas",
year = "2022"
}
In this work, the objective of this work is to implement the Deming cycle to optimize the supplier approval process in an importing and trading company of industrial equipment, Lima 2021. To achieve the implementation, the reality of the company was analyzed in the face of compliance with the aspects of Financial situation and legal obligations, operational capacity, quality management and commercial management that are evaluated according to the questionnaire of the questions of the company SGS del Perú SAC, through quality methods such as Check-List, Cause-Effect and the Pareto diagram, with which it was possible to identify the main causes of a deficiency in the homologation process; for which an applied methodology was used, of an explanatory and descriptive level. It was identified through an internal evaluation before the approval process, most of these aspects were not fulfilled, resulting in a weighted average of 69.10% and considering the company as a non-acceptable level, all the evaluated aspects are considered critical since these They are less than 75% weighting to be considered an acceptable level. The application of the Deming cycle determined that the company did not control its processes, product inventory stock and did not have an annual strategy plan; The causes of the critical aspects were corrected and the supplier approval process was carried out, obtaining as a result 84.76% of the total weighted average, and considering the company to be of an acceptable level. Obtaining a difference of 15.58% to the internal evaluation.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons