Bibliographic citations
Jáuregui, G., (2024). ¿La culpa es solo del conductor?: Un análisis de la responsabilidad de las plataformas digitales frente al consumidor de taxi por aplicativo en el Perú [Trabajo académico, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27639
Jáuregui, G., ¿La culpa es solo del conductor?: Un análisis de la responsabilidad de las plataformas digitales frente al consumidor de taxi por aplicativo en el Perú [Trabajo académico]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27639
@misc{renati/537039,
title = "¿La culpa es solo del conductor?: Un análisis de la responsabilidad de las plataformas digitales frente al consumidor de taxi por aplicativo en el Perú",
author = "Jáuregui Mena, Gonzalo Manuel",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This research seeks to determine the responsibility of the companies that manage digital intermediation platforms (which use the collaborative economy model and C2C commerce in their commercial activity) with respect to the transportation service provided between the driver and the consumer passenger. Thus, the aim of this paper is to determine whether it is necessary to regulate them in the Consumer Protection and Defense Code (CPDC), or whether it is possible to resort to self-regulation systems in consumer matters to clarify the sphere of responsibility in this market. For this purpose, the scope of protection of the CPDC with respect to digital platforms is first analyzed, then the sphere of liability of these platforms is determined, and finally it is clarified whether any express regulation of such liability is required. Consequently, this paper concludes that the CPDC also covers digital platforms as providers of the interconnection service for users, but only limited to the relationship with the passenger or final recipient. Likewise, it is established that, being digital platforms in the transportation sector with governance rules, they present an extension of their sphere of responsibility, covering not only the obligation to establish rules guaranteeing the suitability and safety of the service, but also its compliance. Finally, it is concluded that self-regulatory systems are not adequate to regulate the liability of these companies, due to the lack of representation of consumers and problems in the transparency of their resolutions, being more appropriate their normative regulation.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License