Bibliographic citations
Ramirez, C., (2023). Hacia una nueva generación de políticas públicas de innovación en el Perú. Lecciones y perspectivas desde la experiencia del Programa Nacional de Innovación en pesca y acuicultura [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24202
Ramirez, C., Hacia una nueva generación de políticas públicas de innovación en el Perú. Lecciones y perspectivas desde la experiencia del Programa Nacional de Innovación en pesca y acuicultura []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24202
@mastersthesis{renati/536418,
title = "Hacia una nueva generación de políticas públicas de innovación en el Perú. Lecciones y perspectivas desde la experiencia del Programa Nacional de Innovación en pesca y acuicultura",
author = "Ramirez Gaston Roe, Carlos Javier",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
The study focuses on the analysis and systematization of the National Program for Innovation in Fisheries and Aquaculture (PNIPA) corresponding to the period 2017-2022. It is a case that expresses the proposal and implementation of a sectoral innovation policy. The theoretical bases, the strategic conception, the set of policy instruments that it deploys and the organizational and institutional model that underlies the proposal are analyzed. PNIPA was initially created as part of the R+D+i competitive fund policy to solve “ market failures”. Dominant approach since the 2000s. The analysis of its basic philosophy and the nature of the intervention show that PNIPA has gone further, achieving the outline of a new generation of innovation policies in the country. This new generation is characterized by the more proactive role of the State, the relevance of building an iterative type of governance; and the deployment of a more complex combination of policy instruments (Policy Mix PNIPA). With a mixed bottom-up and top-down intervention, PNIPA addressed both the mission of empowering the protagonists of innovation through networks and innovation agendas by productive chains. This meant the construction of a new public institutionality of the P+A sector with capacities to conduct the sectoral innovation policy. From this, the R+D+i project competitions (EFC/PNIPA) assumed another meaning, based on innovation agendas, the modeling of service markets and the co-creation of public value. The analysis has made possible to observe how a sectoral policy entry, with a high level of specialization, harmony and commitment, is essential to face the complexity, heterogeneity and diversity of the national fishing and aquaculture sector. It is also a gateway for more ambitious policy intervention. ABSTRACT 8 In line with this perspective, PNIPA outlines an organizational and institutional model supported by a Vice-Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture and a public-private Committee to assume the strategic management of innovation policy and a specialized executing unit of the Vice-Ministry itself. However, the latest institutional arrangements created from Law 31250 (2021) -a horizontal organizational approach and “institutional breakdown“- call into question what was outlined by the VPA/PNIPA. This situation could risk the continuity of the innovation policy promoted by PNIPA. The more complex policies proposed by PNIPA have required an intense pace of capacity building, as well as the reform of the current vice-ministerial institutionality. After five years of operation, PNIPA shows interesting achievements, as well as difficulties and limitations in facing an unstable political environment, institutional inertia, and the challenge of acquiring new capacities in a short time. In this regard, a critical factor for the continuity of the PNIPA experience in phase 2 is the quality of the articulation of PNIPA with the VPA. For this, the PNIPA should intensify the efforts to empower its committee and the reform of the vice-ministerial body. This would ensure a dynamic country P&A innovation policy cycle based on a close relationship between strategy, policy and implementation. The study concludes that the transition to a new generation of innovation policies is underway in the sector and in the country. It is a medium- and long-term task that is threatened by the dysfunctions and instability that characterize the country's public institutions. Likewise, it is highlighted that in view of the growing importance that innovation acquires in Peru, the development of a sociology of innovation that accounts for the social, economic and political processes that Peru is experiencing in the effort to find an assembly with the age of knowledge.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License