Bibliographic citations
Rojas, G., (2024). Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución N°9 del Expediente Judicial Electrónico N° 00410-2021- 0-1817-SP-CO-01 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28470
Rojas, G., Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución N°9 del Expediente Judicial Electrónico N° 00410-2021- 0-1817-SP-CO-01 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28470
@misc{renati/535098,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución N°9 del Expediente Judicial Electrónico N° 00410-2021- 0-1817-SP-CO-01",
author = "Rojas Rosales, Gerardo Jaime",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The present legal report addresses a judicial case where an appeal to annul an arbitration award was upheld on the grounds of alleged motivational defects, as it failed to provide an assessment of an expert's report which aimed to highlight the technical deficiencies of a technical file. Therefore, through the analysis of doctrine, legislation, and jurisprudence, the judicial decision is questioned because the judges gave an opinion on the criteria presented by the arbitrators to resolve the arbitration, even though this is prohibited under the Law governing arbitration. Similarly, the report supports the position that the grounds for motivational defects applicable to arbitration awards will be the absence of motivation and the lack of internal justification. Finally, an opinion is presented regarding a substantive issue of the arbitration: the invalidity of one party's contract termination and an alleged violation of res judicata by the arbitration award.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License