Bibliographic citations
Somocurcio, M., (2019). Análisis del desarrollo del presupuesto participativo con las comunidades indígenas del distrito de Palcazu - Oxapampa - Cerro de Pasco [Tesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/13916
Somocurcio, M., Análisis del desarrollo del presupuesto participativo con las comunidades indígenas del distrito de Palcazu - Oxapampa - Cerro de Pasco [Tesis]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/13916
@mastersthesis{renati/533222,
title = "Análisis del desarrollo del presupuesto participativo con las comunidades indígenas del distrito de Palcazu - Oxapampa - Cerro de Pasco",
author = "Somocurcio Aranguri, Maritza Elizabeth",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2019"
}
The objective of this investigation is to know the development of the Participatory Budget of the District of Palcazu, the participation of the Indigenous Communities in that process and its credibility. The purpose of this analysis is to propose actions that improve the development of the Participatory Budget and the participation of the Indigenous Communities in the processes of Citizen Participation. Likewise, the bibliographic review of various authors about Citizen Participation, National and International Regulations, and Indigenous Communities is contemplated. The methodology used was of a mix nature, through a case study. The units of analysis were the chiefs and comuneros of the Indigenous Communities, authorities of the people organizations, authorities of the Municipality of Palcazu and district organizations such as the conciliation committee, associations and federations. For the collection of information, semistructured interviews and documentary review related to the Participatory Budget process have been used. The interviews were directed to three groups: 1) To key informants from four (04) indigenous communities: leaders, heads of communities and members of the community board of directors; 2) to key informants of the Local Government of: officials and representatives of the planning area; 3) to key informants from other nonindigenous institutions: board members and presidents. The application of the interviews shows how the Participatory Budget was developed in 2009, how was the participation of the Indigenous Communities in the Participatory Budget Process, what was the most appropriate means to inform and make the calls, the interaction between Local Government and the Indigenous Communities, if there is a culture of planning and what opportunities did the Indigenous Communities have. Finally, recommendations are given to overcome these limitations and weaknesses.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License