Citas bibligráficas
Angulo, J., (2022). Informe del caso Artavia Murillo y otros vs. Costa Rica [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23111
Angulo, J., Informe del caso Artavia Murillo y otros vs. Costa Rica []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23111
@misc{renati/532428,
title = "Informe del caso Artavia Murillo y otros vs. Costa Rica",
author = "Angulo Atauyuco, Jois Yoselyn Yessenia",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
This report focuses on the limitations observed in the jurisprudential development of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the IACHR) to expressly recognize persons with the capacity to gestate who do not identify themselves as heterosexual cisgender women through the review of the judgment in the case of Artavia Murillo and others vs. Costa Rica. The analysis is complemented by the review of judgments that deal with the violation of rights of LGBTIQ+ people and sexual and (non) reproductive rights - which recognize cisgender women above all as main affected by their violation -. Likewise, it is concluded that the reasoning of the IACHR is predominantly cisexiste and binary and, because of this, makes a reading on the victims as subjects of protection with a cisnormada vision that excludes those who were also in a similar situation of vulnerability due to their ability to gestate (persons assigned women at birth, intersex, trans men, among others).
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.