Citas bibligráficas
Del, J., (2023). Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 4 de la Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima recaída en el Expediente N° 05726-2014 (de conformidad con la Resolución Suprema N° 019-2014-EM) La superposición de concesiones de distribución eléctrica entre COELVISAC y ELECTRONORTE en la zona de Olmos [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25591
Del, J., Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 4 de la Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima recaída en el Expediente N° 05726-2014 (de conformidad con la Resolución Suprema N° 019-2014-EM) La superposición de concesiones de distribución eléctrica entre COELVISAC y ELECTRONORTE en la zona de Olmos []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25591
@misc{renati/530771,
title = "Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 4 de la Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima recaída en el Expediente N° 05726-2014 (de conformidad con la Resolución Suprema N° 019-2014-EM) La superposición de concesiones de distribución eléctrica entre COELVISAC y ELECTRONORTE en la zona de Olmos",
author = "Del Risco Ramírez, José Antonio",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
The purpose of this legal report is to analyze the overlapping electrical distribution concessions between the COELVISAC and ELECTRONORTE, in the Olmos area. This overlap was generated due to the fact that, on the one hand, on January 18, 2014, the Lambayeque Regional Government granted a concession to COELVISAC so that it could carry out electrical distribution activities in the area of the Olmos Irrigation Project. However, on the other hand, on April 7, 2014, through a Supreme Resolution of the Ministry of Energy and Mines, the fifth expansion of the distribution concession of ELECTRONORTE would be approved, in the same area as COELVISAC. Faced with this controversy, three main problems have been identified, which deal, firstly, with the competent entity to grant concessions, as well as concession extensions. Secondly, it will be evaluated whether the Ministry has correctly applied the Electricity Concessions Law and its Regulations in order to grant the concession extension to ENSA. Finally, the third problem seeks to analyze if the principle of subsidiarity provided for in article 60 of the Political Constitution of Peru has been violated. The conclusion of this work is that MINEM not only correctly approved ENSA's concession extension, but also that the rules regulate MINEM's powers have been respected, since the power to resolve requests for distribution concession extensions was never conferred. Finally, ENSA has been developing its business activity respecting article 60 of the Constitution.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons