Citas bibligráficas
Pineda, K., (2022). Informe jurídico sobre la Sentencia N.° 979/2021 (Sentencia de inconstitucionalidad contra la Ley N.° 31131) [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23067
Pineda, K., Informe jurídico sobre la Sentencia N.° 979/2021 (Sentencia de inconstitucionalidad contra la Ley N.° 31131) []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23067
@misc{renati/530470,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Sentencia N.° 979/2021 (Sentencia de inconstitucionalidad contra la Ley N.° 31131)",
author = "Pineda Gutierrez, Kelly Tamara",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
This report aims to analyze the main legal problems that are evidenced in Judgment No. 979/2021, in which the Constitutional Court analyzes the alleged vices of unconstitutionality that are observed in Law No. 31131 -Law that establishes provisions for eradicate discrimination in labor regimes in the public sector, which are claimed by the Executive Branch. Thus, the main controversy of the sentence falls on the unconstitutionality of Law No. 31131, which provides for the incorporation of public servants who are under the Special Regime for Administrative Contracting of Services to the regimes regulated by Legislative Decree No. 728 and Legislative Decree No. 276. Hence, the aforementioned report concludes that the CAS Regime is a distorted and discriminatory regime that hinders the unification that Servir intends to develop and, by making the CAS Regime indeterminate, prevents access to public function and meritocracy in public servants.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons