Bibliographic citations
Vilca, Y., (2022). Análisis de las praxeologías personales asociadas a las sucesiones en alumnos del quinto grado de secundaria [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23798
Vilca, Y., Análisis de las praxeologías personales asociadas a las sucesiones en alumnos del quinto grado de secundaria []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23798
@mastersthesis{renati/530122,
title = "Análisis de las praxeologías personales asociadas a las sucesiones en alumnos del quinto grado de secundaria",
author = "Vilca Sánchez, Yoniln Lincoln",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
The present investigation aims to identify the personal praxeology associated with successions in fifth year high school students; that is, to model and describe the relationship of the student’s knowledge with the successions. Our study is developed within the framework of the Anthropological Theory of Didactics (TAD). In addition, various concepts are used, such as praxeology, task generator, variables, scope of technique and personal praxeology; these tools allow describing and modeling mathematical activity. To achieve our objective, we proceeded in two phases. The first one consisted of studying institutional relations; it included, reviewing the National Curriculum of Basic Education, description of the textbooks and the construction of a praxeological model of reference associated with the successions. The second phase consisted of the study of personal relationships, that is, what knowledge the student has about successions. To determine personal praxeology, it was required to design a questionnaire with possible responses from the students. In the end, the responses of 23 students were analyzed. Finally, eighteen personal praxeology were identified, as well as the representative technique associated with the tasks of finding the k-th term (small or large k) and the n-th term of a succession are: rarithmetic, rfactual y rsymbolic respectively. Furthermore, it was found that five of the eighteen techniques mobilized by the students, were erroneous. We consider that teachers should know the most representative techniques that students mobilize to solve a task, they will make their didactic decisions based on this information.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License