Bibliographic citations
Pareja, C., (2022). La cosa juzgada y su inmutabilidad: problemas conceptuales y una aproximación al estudio de un sistema de estabilidades procesales [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23391
Pareja, C., La cosa juzgada y su inmutabilidad: problemas conceptuales y una aproximación al estudio de un sistema de estabilidades procesales []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23391
@misc{renati/528802,
title = "La cosa juzgada y su inmutabilidad: problemas conceptuales y una aproximación al estudio de un sistema de estabilidades procesales",
author = "Pareja Mujica, Christian Bayardo",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
The institution of res judicata from its initial studies proves to be a very complex and broad institution, going through the analysis of the authors who dedicated important contributions to it until its application in our Peruvian system. Notwithstanding, the present work, starting from a theoretical-procedural view on res judicata, and its regulation and application in the Peruvian system, is oriented to question the character of “immutability“ of res judicata. To this end, showing various procedural mechanisms that lead to the conclusion of the possibility of reviewing a resolution with res judicata authority in the judicial process, we will stress that “immutability“ is no longer a property of the concept “res judicata”, but instead of this, it is more correct to talk about a “high degree of stability“. Following that, the static and dynamic dimensions of legal certainty will be identified, seeking to show that the theory of res judicata as immutability is more consistent with the former, but no longer with the latter. Thus, based on the understanding of legal certainty from the dynamic dimension, it is concluded that the stability provided by res judicata would be relativized and, in this sense, the theory of Antonio do Passo Cabral is critically analyzed, who proposes a renunciation of the immutability of res judicata and chooses to postulate a system of stabilities that, obeying certain circumstances and needs established in the law, would demonstrate the possibility of challenging a decision with res judicata by virtue of a dynamic and flexible legal continuity
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License