Citas bibligráficas
Sumarán, W., (2019). La valoración de las declaraciones de aspirante a colaborador eficaz en las resoluciones judiciales de prisión preventiva y su incidencia en el principio de presunción de inocencia [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/23182
Sumarán, W., La valoración de las declaraciones de aspirante a colaborador eficaz en las resoluciones judiciales de prisión preventiva y su incidencia en el principio de presunción de inocencia [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/23182
@misc{renati/521831,
title = "La valoración de las declaraciones de aspirante a colaborador eficaz en las resoluciones judiciales de prisión preventiva y su incidencia en el principio de presunción de inocencia",
author = "Sumarán Layza, Willam Jhonatan",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2019"
}
The present investigation was carried out with the purpose of determining how the application of article 158, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code, regarding the assessment of the declarations of applicants to an effective collaborator in the judicial decisions on preventive detention, issued by the Courts Criminal Preparatory Investigation and Criminal Chambers of Appeals of La Libertad, affects the principle of presumption of innocence, in the period 2016 to 2018. In sub-chapter I of the theoretical framework called effective collaboration, everything related to it was developed, based on its background in Peruvian legislation, definition, legal nature, foundation, purpose, principles and phases that govern said process, according to the Criminal Procedure Code from 2004 (article 472 ° to 481 ° -A of the Criminal Procedure Code) and DS N ° 007-2017-JUS, until the distinction between an effective collaborating applicant and an effective collaborator itself; as well as the distinction between an accused, co-accused and effective collaborator. In sub-chapter II of the theoretical framework called preventive detention, everything concerning this institution was examined, based on its concept developed by doctrine and jurisprudence, its legal nature, its material budgets, where the analysis focused on the fumus budget comissi delicti (art. 268th paragraph a) of the Criminal Procedure Code), up to the principles governing said procedural institute, focusing mainly on the principle of sufficient evidence. In sub-chapter III of the theoretical framework called probative valuation, we start by explaining its definition, continuing with the analysis of the two large test valuation systems developed throughout history (legal or appraised test system and system of the free assessment), the analysis of the rules of assessment of the evidence developed by the doctrine and recognized by the Criminal Procedure Code of 2004 (general rules, specific rules and rules for cases of insufficient evidence), until the assessment of the assessment of the declarations of aspiring effective collaborators, which according to article 158 ° subsection 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Plenary Agreement 02-2017-SPN (basis 21 - Synthesis of the majority vote) lack probative reliability; and, therefore, they need an external corroboration (sufficient corroboration standard). In the fourth and final sub-chapter of the theoretical framework called the presumption of innocence, everything related to it was analyzed; that is, the presumption of innocence and the constitutional state, its legal nature, its functions (extraprocessal and intraprocessal), its power of limit to the free valuation of the evidence, until a more specific analysis focused on the central theme of the present investigation, such as its link to effective collaboration and preventive detention.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons