Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Bolaños, J., (2016). Resistencia a compresión, flexión y absorción del adobe compactado con adición de goma de tuna [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/10482
Bolaños, J., Resistencia a compresión, flexión y absorción del adobe compactado con adición de goma de tuna [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/10482
@misc{renati/519025,
title = "Resistencia a compresión, flexión y absorción del adobe compactado con adición de goma de tuna",
author = "Bolaños Rodríguez, Juan",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2016"
}
Title: Resistencia a compresión, flexión y absorción del adobe compactado con adición de goma de tuna
Authors(s): Bolaños Rodríguez, Juan
Advisor(s): Mejía Díaz, Iván Hedilbrando
Keywords: Resistencia a la compresión; Suelos; Materiales
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.01
Issue Date: 19-May-2016
Institution: Universidad Privada del Norte
Abstract: RESUMEN
La presente tesis tuvo como objetivo evaluar la resistencia a compresión, flexión y
absorción del adobe compactado con adición de goma de tuna, para ello se realizó el
estudio de suelos para caracterizar los materiales y elaborar bloques de adobe
compactado. La tierra utilizada para la elaboración de las unidades fue extraída de la
cantera “Shaullo Chico”, inicialmente se realizó el análisis granulométrico y los límites de
consistencia para clasificar los suelos y ver si cumple con los requisitos que exige la N.T.P
E.080, luego a través del ensayo de Proctor Modificado permitió determinar la cantidad de
agua necesaria utilizada en los bloques de tierra de la muestra patrón elaborados sin goma
de tuna y en los bloques de tierra con porcentajes de 5%, 10% y 15% con goma de tuna,
estos adobes fueron elaborados a través de la máquina CINVA RAM, disponible en la
Universidad Privada del Norte Cajamarca.
Los resultados obtenidos del ensayo a compresión, en mitades, nos indican que todos los
adobes superan la resistencia mínima que indica la norma técnica de edificaciones E.080,
los resultados de la muestra patrón y con goma de tuna de 5%, 10% y 15% presentan
valores de 19.19 kg/cm², 21.90 kg/cm², 25.27 kg/cm² y 27.56 kg/cm² respectivamente,
siendo el adobe con mejor resistencia a la compresión el de 15% con goma de tuna.
Para el ensayo a flexión y absorción la norma técnica de edificaciones E.080, no especifica
parámetros, para ello se realizó teniendo en cuenta la norma ASTM-C67, donde se
obtuvieron resultados para la muestra patrón de 4.77 kg/cm² y para los porcentajes de 5%,
10% y 15% presentaron valores de 6.47kg/cm², 6.81 kg/cm² y 6.11 kg/cm² respectivamente,
siendo el adobe con mejor resistencia a la flexión el de 10% con goma de tuna.
El ensayo de absorción de las muestras patrón y la muestra de15% de goma de tuna no
se no resistieron la prueba, en cambio con los porcentajes de 5% y 10% se obtuvo una
absorción de 12.68% y 14.62%.
ABSTRACT This thesis aimed to evaluate the compressive strength, bending and absorption of compacted rubber addition tuna, for which the soil study was performed to characterize and develop materials compacted adobe adobe blocks. The land used for the production of the units was quarried “Shaullo Chico“, initially the particle size analysis and consistency limits was made to classify soils and see if it meets the requirements under the NTP E.080, then through trial Modified Proctor allowed to determine the necessary amount of water used in blocks of land pattern made without rubber tuna sample and earth blocks with percentages of 5%, 10% and 15% gum tuna these bricks were made through the CINVA RAM, available at the Private University of North Cajamarca machine. The results of the compression test, halved, indicate that all adobes exceed the minimum resistance indicating the technical standard E.080 buildings, the results of the standard sample and tuna paste of 5%, 10% and 15% have values of 19.19 kg / cm², 21.90 kg / cm², 25.27 kg / cm² and 27.56 kg / cm² respectively, the adobe compressive strength better than 15% with rubber tuna. For testing bending and absorption of the technical standard E.080 buildings, it does not specify parameters for it was made taking into account the standard ASTM-C67, where results for the standard of 4.77 kg / cm² sample was obtained and the percentages of 5%, 10% and 15% had values of 6.47kg / cm², 6.81 kg / cm² and 6.11 kg / cm² respectively, adobe with better flexural strength of 10% with the rubber tuna. The absorption test standard samples and the sample of15% rubber tuna not not withstood the test, whereas the percentages of 5% and 10% absorption of 12.68% and 14.62% was obtained.
ABSTRACT This thesis aimed to evaluate the compressive strength, bending and absorption of compacted rubber addition tuna, for which the soil study was performed to characterize and develop materials compacted adobe adobe blocks. The land used for the production of the units was quarried “Shaullo Chico“, initially the particle size analysis and consistency limits was made to classify soils and see if it meets the requirements under the NTP E.080, then through trial Modified Proctor allowed to determine the necessary amount of water used in blocks of land pattern made without rubber tuna sample and earth blocks with percentages of 5%, 10% and 15% gum tuna these bricks were made through the CINVA RAM, available at the Private University of North Cajamarca machine. The results of the compression test, halved, indicate that all adobes exceed the minimum resistance indicating the technical standard E.080 buildings, the results of the standard sample and tuna paste of 5%, 10% and 15% have values of 19.19 kg / cm², 21.90 kg / cm², 25.27 kg / cm² and 27.56 kg / cm² respectively, the adobe compressive strength better than 15% with rubber tuna. For testing bending and absorption of the technical standard E.080 buildings, it does not specify parameters for it was made taking into account the standard ASTM-C67, where results for the standard of 4.77 kg / cm² sample was obtained and the percentages of 5%, 10% and 15% had values of 6.47kg / cm², 6.81 kg / cm² and 6.11 kg / cm² respectively, adobe with better flexural strength of 10% with the rubber tuna. The absorption test standard samples and the sample of15% rubber tuna not not withstood the test, whereas the percentages of 5% and 10% absorption of 12.68% and 14.62% was obtained.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/11537/10482
Discipline: Ingeniería Civil
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Privada del Norte. Facultad de Ingeniería
Grade or title: Ingeniero Civil
Juror: Aguilar Aliaga, Orlando; Alva Sarmiento, Anita; Chávez Toledo, Teresa
Register date: 19-Jun-2017
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License