Citas bibligráficas
Chilon, A., (2017). La adecuada aplicación de las causales de contradicción en el proceso único de ejecución en el Perú [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/11237
Chilon, A., La adecuada aplicación de las causales de contradicción en el proceso único de ejecución en el Perú [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/11237
@misc{renati/513737,
title = "La adecuada aplicación de las causales de contradicción en el proceso único de ejecución en el Perú",
author = "Chilon Calderon, Analy Rocio",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2017"
}
ABSTRACT In this research we will study the unique process of execution, and specifically the causes of contradiction, which are regulated in Article 690-D of the Civil Procedure Code, which states that “(...) the causes of contradiction can only Be based on: the unenforceability of the obligation contained in the title, the illegality of an obligation, the formal nullity of a security, the falsification of a security and the extinction of an obligation required ...“. In spite of being expressly regulated its application has brought problems for the judicial operators and lawyers respectively, who have difficulties to make an adequate interpretation of the same, as it has been verified in the casuistry and some doctrinal contributions of specialists in the subject. This is why it is important to understand how to adequately apply the causes of contradiction within the single enforcement process, taking into account that they are closed causal, consequently does not give rise to an interpretation extended to other assumptions other than those expressly regulated in Article 690 -D of the Code of Civil Procedure, as based on other different assumptions, the judge declares the inadmissibility of the contradiction. As can be seen from the foregoing, it is possible to notice a requirement in the judicial activity considered vulnerable, since the right of defense of the executed is limited, as it does not have the same defense opportunities that are granted to the performer. However, although the grounds for contradiction are expressly regulated, the same ones that have brought problems in their application by lawyers, since being closed grounds limit the possibility of substantiating them under other assumptions not recognized by the rules, in addition Of the limited evidentiary capacity granted. This creates a limitation to exercise the right of defense. In this sense, the present research work seeks to investigate the consequences of not properly applying the grounds for contradiction in the single process of execution by lawyers, taking into account for that the resolved by the courts and also the indicated By specialists in the field.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.