Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Hidalgo, M., Acero, K. (2024). ¡Santa regulación! Comentarios al Acuerdo N° 006-2019 SUSALUD [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/674566
Hidalgo, M., Acero, K. ¡Santa regulación! Comentarios al Acuerdo N° 006-2019 SUSALUD [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/674566
@misc{renati/419323,
title = "¡Santa regulación! Comentarios al Acuerdo N° 006-2019 SUSALUD",
author = "Acero Cirilo, Katerine Shirley",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2024"
}
Title: ¡Santa regulación! Comentarios al Acuerdo N° 006-2019 SUSALUD
Other Titles: Holy regulation! Criticisms of Agreement N° 006-2019 SUSALUD
Advisor(s): Zuñiga Medina, Thalía Lily
Keywords: Inversión de la carga de la prueba; Procedimiento administrativo trilateral; Calidad regulatoria; Derechos en salud; Reversed burden of proof; Trilateral administrative procedure; Regulatory quality; Health rights
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Issue Date: 27-Jul-2024
Institution: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
Abstract: En un entorno de creciente regulación estatal, existe la creencia de que esta proliferación normativa se traduce en una mejora en la protección de los derechos de las personas. Sin embargo, un exceso de regulación puede conducir una carga administrativa innecesaria a los administrados que, a su vez, puede desalentar a recurrir al Estado en aras de salvaguardar sus derechos.
En efecto, tenemos que la complejidad regulatoria puede generar incertidumbre y costos lo que dificulta su aplicación efectiva; de manera que, su objetivo se ve desvirtuado lo que reduce su impacto positivo.
En ese sentido, mediante Acuerdo N° 006-2019, el Tribunal de la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, acordó oficiar al Ministerio de Salud, a fin de promover la emisión de una ley para aquellos hechos en los cuales se han afectado los derechos del usuario, en procedimientos trilaterales sancionadores, específicamente en casos en el que el extravío de la historia clínica limite el ejercicio de su derecho, en aras de regular la inversión probatoria, lo cual tiene como objeto que la Instituciones Prestadoras de Servicios de Salud, aporten al proceso material probatorio que les permita acreditar la ausencia de responsabilidad en la producción del daño.
Al respecto, el presente Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional analizará si lo acordado en el Acuerdo N° 006-2019, requiere que el MINSA genera una nueva normativa o si la normativa peruana existente cumple plenamente la finalidad que permita a la autoridad sancionadora utilizar los mecanismos ya establecidos para la inversión probatoria en un procedimiento trilateral sancionador.
In an environment of increasing state regulation, there is a belief that this regulatory proliferation translates into an improvement in the protection of people's rights. However, over-regulation can lead to an unnecessary administrative burden on those administered, which, in turn, can discourage them from turning to the state for the sake of safeguarding their rights. Indeed, regulatory complexity can generate uncertainty and costs, which makes it difficult to apply them effectively; In this way, their objective is distorted, which reduces their positive impact. In this regard, through Agreement N° 006-2019, the Court of the National Superintendence of Health, agreed to officiate to the Ministry of Health, in order to promote the issuance of a law for those events in which the rights of the user have been affected, in trilateral sanctioning procedures, specifically in cases in which the loss of the medical record limits the exercise of their right, in order to regulate the evidentiary investment, which has the purpose that the Institutions Providing Health Services contribute to the evidentiary material that allows them to prove the absence of responsibility in the production of the damage. In this regard, this Professional Sufficiency Paper will analyse whether the Agreement N° 006-2019 requires the MINSA to generate a new regulation or if the existing Peruvian regulations fully comply with the purpose that allows the sanctioning authority to use the mechanisms already established for the evidentiary investment in a trilateral sanctioning procedure.
In an environment of increasing state regulation, there is a belief that this regulatory proliferation translates into an improvement in the protection of people's rights. However, over-regulation can lead to an unnecessary administrative burden on those administered, which, in turn, can discourage them from turning to the state for the sake of safeguarding their rights. Indeed, regulatory complexity can generate uncertainty and costs, which makes it difficult to apply them effectively; In this way, their objective is distorted, which reduces their positive impact. In this regard, through Agreement N° 006-2019, the Court of the National Superintendence of Health, agreed to officiate to the Ministry of Health, in order to promote the issuance of a law for those events in which the rights of the user have been affected, in trilateral sanctioning procedures, specifically in cases in which the loss of the medical record limits the exercise of their right, in order to regulate the evidentiary investment, which has the purpose that the Institutions Providing Health Services contribute to the evidentiary material that allows them to prove the absence of responsibility in the production of the damage. In this regard, this Professional Sufficiency Paper will analyse whether the Agreement N° 006-2019 requires the MINSA to generate a new regulation or if the existing Peruvian regulations fully comply with the purpose that allows the sanctioning authority to use the mechanisms already established for the evidentiary investment in a trilateral sanctioning procedure.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/674566
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). Facultad de Derecho
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Zuñiga Medina, Thalía Lily; Rezkalah Accinelli, Eduardo Jose
Register date: 1-Aug-2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License