Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Flores, Y., (2023). Informe para la sustentación de expediente: 02309-2021-PA/TC [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671790
Flores, Y., Informe para la sustentación de expediente: 02309-2021-PA/TC [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671790
@misc{renati/413269,
title = "Informe para la sustentación de expediente: 02309-2021-PA/TC",
author = "Flores Puga, Yessenia Noelia",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
Title: Informe para la sustentación de expediente: 02309-2021-PA/TC
Authors(s): Flores Puga, Yessenia Noelia
Keywords: Amparo; Tribunal Constitucional; Derecho a la educación; Resolución ministerial; Amparo; Constitutional court; Right to education; Ministerial resolution
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Issue Date: 2-May-2023
Institution: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
Abstract: En el presente trabajo de suficiencia profesional, se desarrolla una Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional signada en el Expediente N° 02309-2021-PA/TC, respecto a una demanda de Amparo interpuesta por el Sr. W.D.L.A en representación de su menor hijo de iniciales P.D.A.L.N por una supuesta vulneración al derecho de acceso a la Educación, al no permitir la matrícula de su menor hijo en la IEP “San Vicente” ya que no contaba con la edad cronológica establecida en la Resolución Ministerial N° 657-2017-MINEDU, que establece que para acceder a primer grado de primaria se debe cumplir 06 años de edad antes del 31 de marzo de 2018, sin embargo, el los cumplía el 23 de junio de 2018, fecha posterior de la requerida por la norma.
En ese sentido, el objetivo de este trabajo es analizar si la aplicación de la norma contenida en la Resolución Ministerial N° 657-2017-MINEDU, afecta el Derecho a la Educación del menor de iniciales P.D.A.L.N, evaluando el derecho constitucionalmente protegido, y el criterio que tiene el Tribunal Constitucional respecto a la aplicación de la norma sin vulnerar el Principio del Interés Superior del Niño, con una evaluación de doctrina y jurisprudencia respecto al tema.
In the present work of professional sufficiency, a Judgment of the Constitutional Court signed in Case No. 02309-2021-PA/TC is developed, regarding an Amparo lawsuit filed by Mr. W.D.L.A on behalf of his minor son with initials P.D.A.L. N for an alleged violation of the right of access to Education, by not allowing the enrollment of his minor in the IEP "San Vicente" for not having the chronological age established in the Ministerial Resolution N° 657-2017-MINEDU, which establishes that to access first grade of primary school, the child must be 06 years old before March 31, 2018, however, he was 06 years old on June 23, 2018, later than the date required by the norm. In this sense, the objective of this work is to analyze whether the application of the rule contained in Ministerial Resolution No. 657-2017-MINEDU, affects the Right to Education of the minor with initials P.D.A.L.N, evaluating the constitutionally protected right, and the criterion that the Constitutional Court has regarding the application of the rule without violating the Principle of the Best Interest of the Child, with an evaluation of doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the issue.
In the present work of professional sufficiency, a Judgment of the Constitutional Court signed in Case No. 02309-2021-PA/TC is developed, regarding an Amparo lawsuit filed by Mr. W.D.L.A on behalf of his minor son with initials P.D.A.L. N for an alleged violation of the right of access to Education, by not allowing the enrollment of his minor in the IEP "San Vicente" for not having the chronological age established in the Ministerial Resolution N° 657-2017-MINEDU, which establishes that to access first grade of primary school, the child must be 06 years old before March 31, 2018, however, he was 06 years old on June 23, 2018, later than the date required by the norm. In this sense, the objective of this work is to analyze whether the application of the rule contained in Ministerial Resolution No. 657-2017-MINEDU, affects the Right to Education of the minor with initials P.D.A.L.N, evaluating the constitutionally protected right, and the criterion that the Constitutional Court has regarding the application of the rule without violating the Principle of the Best Interest of the Child, with an evaluation of doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the issue.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671790
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). Facultad de Derecho
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Rezkalah Accinelli, Eduardo Jose; Quiroz Villalobos, Milton Ebert; Paredes San Román, Felipe Andrés
Register date: 25-Jan-2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License