Citas bibligráficas
Pariona, E., Vera, S. (2023). Cancelados: Las consecuencias de la falta de uso de una marca (Análisis de la Resolución Nº 0410-2020/TPI-INDECOPI) [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671219
Pariona, E., Vera, S. Cancelados: Las consecuencias de la falta de uso de una marca (Análisis de la Resolución Nº 0410-2020/TPI-INDECOPI) [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671219
@misc{renati/411924,
title = "Cancelados: Las consecuencias de la falta de uso de una marca (Análisis de la Resolución Nº 0410-2020/TPI-INDECOPI)",
author = "Vera Pacheco , Solange Maria",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
The main objective of this work on professional sufficiency is to analyze the precedent of mandatory observance of the Resolution Nº 410-2020/TPI-INDECOPI, which resolves the case on cancellation of trademark registration for lack of use. For this reason, we must point out that the present case begins with the request for cancellation of trademark registration filed by the company NA S.A. Brazil's Against the Brand “Garden Natura” with Certificate Nº 216096 belonging to Class 3 of the International Classification, being the owner of the registered trademark the company DIS S.A.C. of Peru. The applicant alleged that the company that owns the trademark has not used the trademark for three consecutive years prior to the cancellation action. In this regard, the Commission on Distinctive Signs of the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property proceeded to analyze and consequently resolve the dispute, declaring the request to be founded in part. Subsequently, the company DIS S.A.C. filed an appeal, which was resolved by the Tribunal for the Defense of Competition and Intellectual Property, which confirmed the decision of the First Instance. In view of the above, we must point out that it is pertinent to carry out a correct analysis of the procedural acts carried out within the case. Subsequently, a legal opinion will be provided on the relevance of the precedent and its impact on the market.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons