Citas bibligráficas
Vega, X., Okuda, M. (2023). La afectación de la prescripción adquisitiva de dominio a partir del análisis de la casación N° 4725-2019 [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670739
Vega, X., Okuda, M. La afectación de la prescripción adquisitiva de dominio a partir del análisis de la casación N° 4725-2019 [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670739
@misc{renati/410834,
title = "La afectación de la prescripción adquisitiva de dominio a partir del análisis de la casación N° 4725-2019",
author = "Okuda Velasquez, Miki Yoshiko",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
This paper analyzes the pronouncement issued in a cassation court, which evaluated the question of whether the judicial proceedings filed by the owner of a property against someone requesting the acquisitive prescription of domain would affect the requirements of pacificity and continuity of the latter. For this purpose, the basic concepts established by the regulations and doctrine related to the real rights of ownership and possession, as well as the acquisitive prescription of domain, are used, delving into the causes of interruption and suspension, and it is concluded that the judicial proceedings by themselves do not affect the requirements of pacificity or continuity, but that this affectation will depend on whether these processes are protected and the restitution of the property to the owner is ordered through an eviction of the defendant, for the development of the work, legal articles, books, regulations and jurisprudence have been consulted, therefore, the position expressed in the singular vote issued in a cassation decision is shared.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons