Citas bibligráficas
Cubillas, S., Coria, C. (2023). Evaluación numérica del comportamiento sísmico de un muro Inca del Templo del Coricancha en el Cusco con encajes y sin encajes [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670494
Cubillas, S., Coria, C. Evaluación numérica del comportamiento sísmico de un muro Inca del Templo del Coricancha en el Cusco con encajes y sin encajes [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670494
@misc{renati/410313,
title = "Evaluación numérica del comportamiento sísmico de un muro Inca del Templo del Coricancha en el Cusco con encajes y sin encajes",
author = "Coria Rios, Carlo Fabrizio",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
The Inca walls have possibly suffered different types of damage over time caused by nature, one of these causes is seismic events. The seismic silence that the Cusco region is experiencing is the main threat to the different structures that still survive since their construction. This is because active faults such as Qoricocha and Tambomachay are located around the Cusco region, where the largest earthquake in recent years was recorded. Currently, there are very few studies on these types of dry joint structures that help implement conservation and preservation measures so that they can be appreciated by future generations. For this reason, this research study aims to contribute to the numerical evaluation of the seismic behavior of an Inca wall with and without lace from the Coricancha Temple in Cusco. To carry out this study, first an Inca wall from the Coricancha Temple was chosen, then two cases were designated for the wall, with lace and without lace. In this way, both cases were drawn in AutoCAD and exported to Abaqus software. Then, the modeling of the wall evaluated with the Paruro earthquake was carried out at different scales. As a result, it was obtained that, for a PGA of 0.1g, the maximum relative displacement was 0.079m in the wall with socket and 0.279m in the wall without socket. While, for a PGA of 0.2g the maximum relative displacement was 0.441m and 0.245m respectively. On the other hand, when the PGA was 0.3g, a partial collapse of 29.41% was obtained in the wall with socket and a practically total collapse of 84.21% in the wall without socket. Finally, when the PGA was 0.4g, a collapse of 41.18% was obtained for the wall with socket, while, in the case of the wall without socket, it was not evaluated since the total collapse of the structure persists from the PGA of 0.3g.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons