Citas bibligráficas
Saona, D., Perez, J. (2023). Propuesta de utilización de muretes prefabricados reforzados con bambú tipo guadua angustifolia como alternativa estructural de los muretes no portantes de albañilería confinada en el distrito de Comas [Tesis, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668078
Saona, D., Perez, J. Propuesta de utilización de muretes prefabricados reforzados con bambú tipo guadua angustifolia como alternativa estructural de los muretes no portantes de albañilería confinada en el distrito de Comas [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668078
@misc{renati/405351,
title = "Propuesta de utilización de muretes prefabricados reforzados con bambú tipo guadua angustifolia como alternativa estructural de los muretes no portantes de albañilería confinada en el distrito de Comas",
author = "Perez Huaman, Juan Carlos",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
In Peru, the traditional construction system most used for non-bearing walls is confined masonry, where the main unit of masonry is tambourine brick, due to its economic price in the market. These units present voids greater than 50%, being less dense and resistant. The non-bearing wall, as it presents a high dead weight, has a greater probability of overturning in case of an earthquake, which is a risk for the people who inhabit said houses. In this sense, the development of an innovative construction system for non-bearing walls aims to be a solution to avoid excessive costs and improve structural performance compared to the traditional system. In this research, the application of prefabricated walls reinforced with bamboo type guadua angustifolia is implemented as a structural alternative for non-bearing walls of confined masonry in the district of Comas. Bamboo-reinforced prefabricated low walls were built, and diagonal compression tested to determine their resistance to shearing and bending to establish the modulus of rupture. The results of the proposal show that costs are reduced by 41% and structural performance is improved in terms of compression by 23% and bending by 60% with respect to the minimum allowable resistance of ACI 318-19. Finally, it was found that it is 2% lighter and contributes to the reduction of the seismic impact on the building.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons