Citas bibligráficas
Castañeda, K., (2023). Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668000
Castañeda, K., Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668000
@misc{renati/405314,
title = "Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25",
author = "Castañeda Romero, Katherine Brenda",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
The present case concerns an administrative procedure for the cancellation of a trademark registration due to lack of use, initiated at the request of the company Productos Familia S.A against Medifarma S.A., the owner of the PETALO trademark. The conditions of use of the trademark are analyzed to determine if it has been used for three consecutive years prior to the filing of the action. For the purposes of the case, Productos Familia S.A argues that the owner company has not used the trademark for three consecutive years preceding the cancellation action. Likewise, it will be analyzed if the evidence presented by Medifarma S.A, such as the License Agreement for the Use of Trademarks and Know-How, which would prove that another company, has used the trademark in dispute, and invoices that, in their opinion, demonstrate the use of the trademark, are sufficient evidence to determine the use of a trademark and therefore its cancellation. In conclusion, this section of the report will analyze the appropriate evaluation criteria to prove the use of the trademark, as well as assess the documents in the file to perform a critical analysis of the case.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons