Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Castañeda, K., (2023). Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668000
Castañeda, K., Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668000
@misc{renati/405314,
title = "Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25",
author = "Castañeda Romero, Katherine Brenda",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
Title: Expediente N° 199324-2004 Expediente N° 1999-40541-0-0100-J-CI-25
Authors(s): Castañeda Romero, Katherine Brenda
Keywords: Valoración probatoria; Cancelación por falta de uso; Contrato de licencia de uso; Formalidad; Evidentiary assessment; Cancellation due to lack of use; Use license agreement; Formality
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 12-May-2023
Institution: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
Abstract: El presente expediente versa sobre un caso de cancelación de marca por su no uso; iniciado a solicitud de la empresa Productos Familia S.A contra Medifarma S.A., titular de la marca PETALO; se analizaron los términos de la utilización de la marca para determinar si esta ha sido utilizada durante tres años consecutivos, anteriores, a la presentación de la acción. Para efectos del caso, Productos Familia S.A argumenta que, la empresa titular no ha utilizado la marca durante tres años consecutivos, precedentes a la acción de cancelación. Asimismo, se analizará si las pruebas presentadas por Medifarma S.A, tales como el “Contrato de Licencia de Uso de marcas y Know how”, mediante el cual acreditaría que otra empresa, sí ha hecho utilización de la marca objeto de litis y facturas que a su consideración evidencian el uso de la marca, son pruebas suficientes para determinar el uso de una marca y por consiguiente la cancelación de registro de la misma.
En conclusión, en este apartado del Informe, se analizará los criterios de valoración adecuados para acreditar el uso de la marca, así como se valorará los instrumentos que obran en el expediente para efectos de realizar un análisis crítico del caso.
The present case concerns an administrative procedure for the cancellation of a trademark registration due to lack of use, initiated at the request of the company Productos Familia S.A against Medifarma S.A., the owner of the PETALO trademark. The conditions of use of the trademark are analyzed to determine if it has been used for three consecutive years prior to the filing of the action. For the purposes of the case, Productos Familia S.A argues that the owner company has not used the trademark for three consecutive years preceding the cancellation action. Likewise, it will be analyzed if the evidence presented by Medifarma S.A, such as the License Agreement for the Use of Trademarks and Know-How, which would prove that another company, has used the trademark in dispute, and invoices that, in their opinion, demonstrate the use of the trademark, are sufficient evidence to determine the use of a trademark and therefore its cancellation. In conclusion, this section of the report will analyze the appropriate evaluation criteria to prove the use of the trademark, as well as assess the documents in the file to perform a critical analysis of the case.
The present case concerns an administrative procedure for the cancellation of a trademark registration due to lack of use, initiated at the request of the company Productos Familia S.A against Medifarma S.A., the owner of the PETALO trademark. The conditions of use of the trademark are analyzed to determine if it has been used for three consecutive years prior to the filing of the action. For the purposes of the case, Productos Familia S.A argues that the owner company has not used the trademark for three consecutive years preceding the cancellation action. Likewise, it will be analyzed if the evidence presented by Medifarma S.A, such as the License Agreement for the Use of Trademarks and Know-How, which would prove that another company, has used the trademark in dispute, and invoices that, in their opinion, demonstrate the use of the trademark, are sufficient evidence to determine the use of a trademark and therefore its cancellation. In conclusion, this section of the report will analyze the appropriate evaluation criteria to prove the use of the trademark, as well as assess the documents in the file to perform a critical analysis of the case.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668000
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). Facultad de Derecho
Grade or title: Abogado
Register date: 20-Jun-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License