Bibliographic citations
Rojas, E., Riveros, M. (2020). Evaluación estructural de edificios de uso multifamiliar diseñados con la norma sismorresistente E.030 1977 utilizando la norma E.030 2016 [Tesis, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/651680
Rojas, E., Riveros, M. Evaluación estructural de edificios de uso multifamiliar diseñados con la norma sismorresistente E.030 1977 utilizando la norma E.030 2016 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/651680
@misc{renati/390253,
title = "Evaluación estructural de edificios de uso multifamiliar diseñados con la norma sismorresistente E.030 1977 utilizando la norma E.030 2016",
author = "Riveros Rodriguez, Milagros Catherine",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2020"
}
Today, in Lima there are buildings in operation of more than 25 years old or exceeding their useful life. In this context, the behavior of a building commonly used built in those years and under seismic criteria that had little history of quakes compared to the criteria in our current legislation, could be a latent risk to an eventual earthquake of great consideration. The aim of this work is to conduct a structural assessment 4 multifamily buildings designed with the E.030 standard 1977 using the criteria given by the Earthquake Resistant Standard E.030 2016 through static and dynamic methods of nonlinear seismic analysis modal-spectral. The first thing that was developed for the structural evaluation was the collection of information on the buildings with an average age of 25 years, to then carry out the structural modeling in the ETABS program and, subsequently, perform the seismic analysis in the 4 buildings, which have a dual structural system of reinforced concrete. Next, compliance with drifts, minimum seismic joints and the resistance of the structural elements to the efforts obtained by the software were verified. The shear of the building and the beam - column interaction were also verified. The results show that only the total building meets the allowable derived from standard E.030 2016; however, on 3 of 4 buildings becomes considerably the alleged failure of beam-column joint.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License