Citas bibligráficas
Romero, J., Julca, R. (2020). Análisis dinámico no lineal de un modelo de vivienda de adobe reforzado con sogas [Tesis, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/650365
Romero, J., Julca, R. Análisis dinámico no lineal de un modelo de vivienda de adobe reforzado con sogas [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/650365
@misc{renati/389490,
title = "Análisis dinámico no lineal de un modelo de vivienda de adobe reforzado con sogas",
author = "Julca Huerta, Ricardo Alexander",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2020"
}
Adobe masonry houses do not resist large tensile or shear stresses, they are fragile and not suitable for seismic areas (Arroyo, Catalan, & Sanchez, 2013). These types of homes are widely used for their low cost and many are built in areas of high seismic danger (Blondet, Vargas, Tarque, & Iwaki, 2011). To study the seismic behavior of adobe masonry hoses, laboratory tests and computational models are carried out. The displacements, forces and cracking patterns are extracted from the tests. For the computational model, a idealized structure is build in a software and the behaviour results validated with the test. In Peru, seismic simulation tests of adobe masonry house models without reinforcement have been carried out, which collapsed under severe movements (Tarque, Camata, Spacone, Varum, & Blondet, 2014) (Torrealva & Vargas, 1984). In the case of the tests carried out on reinforced housing models, there was no collapse of the structure. For this investigation, a seismic simulation test was carried out on an adobe masonry house model reinforced with ropes. The objective of the thesis is to estimate the displacements and forces in the ropes using a computational model and validate the results with a laboratory test. The computational model was made in the ABAQUS program of finite elements using the damage and plasticity model that allows the nonlinear dynamic analysis of adobe masonry. The responses were compared with the laboratory test, obtaining up to an error of 21% in maximum displacements and 41% in maximum forces. Similar cracking patterns were had.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons