Bibliographic citations
Madalengoitia, J., (2024). Las reglas interpretativas de obligatorio cumplimiento y el sometimiento de los jueces a la constitución y las leyes [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/34131
Madalengoitia, J., Las reglas interpretativas de obligatorio cumplimiento y el sometimiento de los jueces a la constitución y las leyes [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/34131
@misc{renati/381101,
title = "Las reglas interpretativas de obligatorio cumplimiento y el sometimiento de los jueces a la constitución y las leyes",
author = "Madalengoitia Niño, Julia Margoth.",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2024"
}
The thesis entitled “The interpretative rules of mandatory compliance and the submission of judges to the constitution and the laws” begins by questioning the very new reformed text of article 112 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary; Therefore, this article has created an apparent new normative concept “interpretive rule”, the same one that binds the other jurisdictional bodies of the republic. In such a way that, according to the researcher, this article violates basic and elementary legal principles, endangering its constitutional order. For this reason, this investigation opens with the following question: Why do mandatory interpretative rules violate the principle that judges must be subject to the constitution and the laws? In that sense, we have proposed the following as a general objective: “Demonstrate why mandatory interpretative rules violate the principle that judges must be subject to the constitution and the laws.” Finally, and after the theoretical information collected, which has been contrasted and analyzed, the following general conclusion has been reached: “The interpretative rules of mandatory compliance violate the principle that judges must be subject to the constitution and the laws.” ; Well, it is article 112 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary, which would be compelling judges to submit to said rules; However, by virtue of the principle of Constitutional Supremacy, said binding nature, created by law, would be in contravention of the current Constitution itself.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License