Citas bibligráficas
Sandoval, M., (2019). Inobservancia del derecho a ser oido del acusado en juicio oral como infracción constitucional y convencional del derecho de defensa, presunción de inocencia, contradicción y equidad [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/5534
Sandoval, M., Inobservancia del derecho a ser oido del acusado en juicio oral como infracción constitucional y convencional del derecho de defensa, presunción de inocencia, contradicción y equidad [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/5534
@misc{renati/380235,
title = "Inobservancia del derecho a ser oido del acusado en juicio oral como infracción constitucional y convencional del derecho de defensa, presunción de inocencia, contradicción y equidad",
author = "Sandoval Zavaleta, Mary Carmen",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2019"
}
The general objective of this thesis report was to determine whether the judges' right to be heard by the accused in oral proceedings prescribed in Article 139, paragraph 14, as a constitutional and conventional infraction of the right of defense, presumption of innocence, contradiction and that of equity, brings the nullity of the sentence. In the information gathering stage for the elaboration of the thematic dispersion of the chapters of the theoretical framework, the sources of consultation were used, such as books, legal journals, national and comparative legislation, jurisprudence, using the information sheets as an instrument for gathering information. registration and research. Regarding the results of the investigation developed in the chapters of the theoretical framework, it was obtained that the guarantees and rights of the constitutionalized criminal process suppose the recognition of the inalienable and inviolable rights of man in basic norms that make them unavailable, the sentence is the Higher resolution that ends the criminal process and the procedural nullity is a procedural remedy that aims to review the procedural activity when it presents structural irregularities, among the legal grounds to include the right to be heard as a fundamental right in the Constitution and as a ground for nullity in the criminal procedure code, it is said that the doctrine considers the right to be heard as part of the essential content of the right of defense and is regulated in international treaties ratified by Peru as the American Convention of Rights. Human, the Universal Declaration of Rights Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The main conclusion of the investigative work is that the judges' nonobservance of the right to be heard from the defendant in oral proceedings prescribed in article 139 subsection 14 as a constitutional and conventional infraction of the right of defense, presumption of innocence, contradiction and fairness, if It entails the nullity of the sentence in an insurmountable manner since the supreme court indicates that it is an expression of a constitutionalized criminal law, being necessary to include it as a fundamental right in the constitution and as grounds for nullity in the new criminal procedure code.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.