Citas bibligráficas
Tabra, A., (2019). Método de casos como estrategia didáctica para mejorar el aprendizaje significativo de los estudiantes del VIII ciclo del curso Perforación - Voladura de Ingeniería de Minas de la Universidad Privada del Norte 2019 - II [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/5673
Tabra, A., Método de casos como estrategia didáctica para mejorar el aprendizaje significativo de los estudiantes del VIII ciclo del curso Perforación - Voladura de Ingeniería de Minas de la Universidad Privada del Norte 2019 - II [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/5673
@mastersthesis{renati/378170,
title = "Método de casos como estrategia didáctica para mejorar el aprendizaje significativo de los estudiantes del VIII ciclo del curso Perforación - Voladura de Ingeniería de Minas de la Universidad Privada del Norte 2019 - II",
author = "Tabra Huaylinos, Amador Leonardo",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2019"
}
This study was carried out with the purpose of demonstrating whether the case method as a didactic strategy improves the significant learning of the students of the eighth cycle of the drilling and blasting course of the Faculty of Mining Engineering of the Universidad Privada del Norte of the district of Trujillo, during the 2019-II cycle. The research has as a study population of 31 students and a sample of them, distributed in the pre-experimental group (31). The type of technological research and experimental design with an equivalent group with pretest and postest. The use of the case method as a didactic strategy was carried out in 10 teaching-learning sessions. Since its application; the students in research, reached the process level and also the achieved. After applying the case method as a didactic strategy, it was found that significant learning improved significantly, as confirmed by the “t” test (-11.26 <0.00); in percentage before it was 61.30% at the start level and then 74.19% at the process level, while the average on the vigesimal scale reached before 30.87 and after 43.68 with a difference of 12.89, also in the indicators of knowledge, procedures and attitudes reached the level process and achieved.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.