Citas bibligráficas
Carranza, N., Sullon, C. (2022). Análisis comparativo técnico económico de un concreto convencional y un concreto empleando agua clorificada del río Moche – Trujillo, 2021 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/8547
Carranza, N., Sullon, C. Análisis comparativo técnico económico de un concreto convencional y un concreto empleando agua clorificada del río Moche – Trujillo, 2021 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/8547
@misc{renati/377730,
title = "Análisis comparativo técnico económico de un concreto convencional y un concreto empleando agua clorificada del río Moche – Trujillo, 2021",
author = "Sullon Quispe, Carmen Marley",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2022"
}
The present research proposes to use an alternative to the use of drinking water for the manufacture and curing of concrete (concrete), because it is the most used material in the construction industry and therefore there is a high demand. It has been proposed to use the water from the Moche River for which in the first instance a physical-chemical analysis was carried out in order to evaluate if the properties did not exceed the limits established by the Peruvian technical standard, when yielding acceptable results, it was no longer necessary to use of a chlorine treatment and proceeded to use it directly as mixing and curing water for concrete. To evaluate the characteristics of the concrete in the fresh and hardened state, a mixture dosage was made for a concrete f'c = 210 kg / cm2 following the regulations established by ACI 211.1 using the data from the tests corresponding to the characterization of the aggregates from from the Quebrada El León Quarry. For compressive strength tests, 24 specimens were made using potable water and 24 using water from the Moche River, which were tested in batches of 6 units at the ages of 1, 3, 7 and 28 days. The compressive strength test is generally the one that indicates the quality of a concrete and for our study a resistance to 28 days of 343 kg / cm2 was obtained for the water of the Moche river and for the concrete with drinking water of 350 kg / cm2, both results being acceptable since it exceeds the resistance for which they were designed. Likewise, 3 beams were manufactured using potable water and 3 beams using water from the Moche River to test them in flexion, and a modulus of rupture for concrete with potable water of 6.54 and 6.07 for concrete was calculated, resulting in acceptable values for both types of concrete. Finally, an economic analysis was made for 1 m3 of concrete made using potable water and another using water from the Moche River, having a cost of S / 324.40 and S / 323.84 respectively. Finally, it was determined that concrete made with water from the Moche River is a viable alternative to use, since it yields higher results than technically expected and is also S / 0.56 cheaper than conventional concrete.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons