Citas bibligráficas
Fonseca, R., (2018). Episiotomía como factor de riesgo de prolapso de órgano pélvico. Hospital Víctor Lazarte Echegaray [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/3937
Fonseca, R., Episiotomía como factor de riesgo de prolapso de órgano pélvico. Hospital Víctor Lazarte Echegaray [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/3937
@misc{renati/377474,
title = "Episiotomía como factor de riesgo de prolapso de órgano pélvico. Hospital Víctor Lazarte Echegaray",
author = "Fonseca Centurión, Rodrigo Alonso",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2018"
}
Objective: To determine if episiotomy is a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse in the patients of Víctor Lazarte Echegaray Hospital in the period 2014-2016. Material and Methods: An analytical, observational, retrospective, cross-sectional case-control study was carried out based on the review of medical records. The sample of the study population, obtained by formula, was constituted by 330 patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, divided into two groups: 165 cases with prolapse and 165 controls without prolapse. Results: Episiotomy was present in 116 cases and 87 controls and presented significant statistical difference (p = 0.001 and 95% CI = 1.349-3.337), OR of 2.12. The urethrocystocele was present in 60% of the cases, followed by the uterus in 26.1% and rectocele in 13.9%. The history of episiotomy in the case group was observed in 70 patients with urethrocystocele. The OR was 1.77, with p = 0.025 and 95% CI = 1.073- 2.948. The episiotomy showed no statistically significant difference when associated with uterotomy or rectocele. The average age for the cases and controls was 61.97 ± 5.55 and 61.25 ± 5.03 respectively; the frequency of episiotomy was 70.3% for cases and 52.7% for controls. Conclusions: Episiotomy was a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse and was confirmed in the case of urethrocystocele, while for uterus and rectocele it was not. The communication to the medical staff about the risk found and the need for longer term research, even in other institutions, is suggested.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.