Bibliographic citations
Diez, C., (2018). La responsabilidad civil ante la denegatoria a la pensión de jubilación en sede administrativa y reconocida en sede judicial [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/4114
Diez, C., La responsabilidad civil ante la denegatoria a la pensión de jubilación en sede administrativa y reconocida en sede judicial [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/4114
@mastersthesis{renati/377101,
title = "La responsabilidad civil ante la denegatoria a la pensión de jubilación en sede administrativa y reconocida en sede judicial",
author = "Diez Canseco Solano, Carlos Alfonso Jesús",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2018"
}
The present investigation is concerned with the configuration of civil liability against the refusal to the right to the retirement pension in administrative, but later recognized in court, whose object is the obtaining of compensation for damages, precisely for non-timely recognition. In view of the above-mentioned fact and in the face of qualitative research, the following sentence is elaborated: Are the elements of civil liability established for the Office of Social Security Standardization by expressly rejecting the application for a retirement pension in an administrative and recognized place of residence judicial?; leading to a hypothesis that allows to approach the statement, deepening the study under the national doctrines as international, as well as the relevant Laws according to the matter and the jurisprudence issued. The purpose of the present investigation is to identify the budgets for accessing the retirement pension, analyze the budgets of civil liability, and finally, explain the presence or absence of connection between the express denial of retirement pension and the configuration of the elements of civil liability. In order to address the stated objectives, the present research has been aided by the inductive, deductive, analytical, hermeneutic and exegetical method, which have allowed us to obtain a better picture of the problematic reality presented. Finally, a discussion of the results obtained has been made, having as conclusions that the anti-legal fact is absent as an element of civil liability when issuing an express pronouncement on the part of the Pension Administration Entity; because it is complying with the request formulated, fulfilling its duty and function as an institution of the State, leading to the rupture of a link with the alleged damage caused and the absence of any attribution of its act as culpable or malicious
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.