Citas bibligráficas
Villalobos, D., (2024). La regulación de la violencia o intimidación como causal de contradicción en el Proceso Único de Ejecución, PERÚ -2023 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/28631
Villalobos, D., La regulación de la violencia o intimidación como causal de contradicción en el Proceso Único de Ejecución, PERÚ -2023 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/28631
@misc{renati/373821,
title = "La regulación de la violencia o intimidación como causal de contradicción en el Proceso Único de Ejecución, PERÚ -2023",
author = "Villalobos Vargas, Darwin Smith",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2024"
}
The present investigation called ““ The regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction in the Single Execution Process, PERU - 2023““ has as its main objective to determine how the regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction would influence the right of contradiction in the Single Execution Process. Likewise, we set ourselves the following specific objectives. These are: Determine doctrinally the assumptions of the right of contradiction in the Single Execution Process, in order to determine the need for its development, analyze how the regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction would influence the right of contradiction and propose the regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction in the Single Execution Process. Regarding the statement of the problem, the following question arises: In what way does the regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction would influence the right of contradiction in the Single Execution Process? Proposing as a hypothesis that the regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction would influence the right of contradiction in the Single Execution Process, better guaranteeing the application of the procedural principles of contradiction, due process and effective jurisdictional protection. Regarding the methodology, the following methods will be applied: doctrinal, hermeneutical-legal, deductive, systematic, exegetical, descriptive-explanatory and analytical-synthetic, from a non-experimental research design. Likewise, techniques and instruments were used that allowed determining that the regulation of violence or intimidation as a cause of contradiction would affect the right of contradiction, its incorporation into the Single Execution Process is necessary
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons