Look-up in Google Scholar
Title: Efecto antimicrobiano del ácido acético y la clorhexidina al 0,12% en la desinfección de cepillos dentales
Advisor(s): Pisconte León, Evelyn Giovanna
Issue Date: 2020
Institution: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego
Abstract: Evaluar el efecto antimicrobiano del Ácido acético al 50% y al 100%; y compararlo con la Clorhexidina al 0.12% en la desinfección de cepillos dentales. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El estudio es experimental, prospectivo, transversal y comparativo, se desarrolló en la I.E. N° 80018-Trujillo. Fueron asignados aleatoriamente 15 alumnos, se cepillaron una vez al día por una semana sin pasta dental para recolectar su carga microbiana. En laboratorio, se incubaron los cabezales de los cepillos en Tioglicolato por 24h, se retiró 0.1ml de cada uno para sembrarlo en placas petri por 24h (Registro basal) y 0.2ml para adicionar a los 0.8ml de tratamiento (ácido acético al 50% y 100%, y clorhexidina al 0.12%) en tubos de ensayo incubando por 24h. Se retiró 0.1ml de cada uno, se sembraron en placas petri e incubaron por 24h. Finalmente se hizo el conteo UFC. (60 placas petri: 45 tratamientos y 15 basales). RESULTADOS: El recuento basal de 8x106 ufc disminuyó después de los tratamientos, el menor recuento fue la clorhexidina al 0.12% con 1.07 ufc, seguido del ácido acético al 100% con 3.07 ufc y ácido acético al 50% con 4.73 ufc. CONCLUSION: Al comparar las concentraciones de ácido acético y la clorhexidina, no mostraron diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre sí (p=0.993); pero al compararlas con el recuento basal se observa que si existe diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0.000). Produciendo un mayor efecto la clorhexidina al 0.12%, seguida del ácido acético al 100% y finalmente el ácido acético al 50%.

Evaluate the antimicrobial effect of Acetic Acid at 50% and 100%; and compare it with 0.12% Chlorhexidine in the disinfection of toothbrushes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is experimental, prospective, cross-sectional and comparative, it was developed in the I.E. No. 80018- Trujillo. 15 students were formed, who brushed once a day for a week without toothpaste to collect their microbial load, in the laboratory, the brush heads were incubated in Tioglycollate for 24h, 0.1ml of each was withdrawn to sow it in petri dishes for 24h (basal record) and 0.2ml to add to the 0.8ml of treatment (acetic acid 50% and 100%, and chlorhexidine 0.12%) in test tubes incubating for 24h. 0.1 ml of each was withdrawn, they were seeded in petri dishes and incubated for 24 hours. Finally, the UFC count was done. (60 petri dishes: 45 treatments and 15 basal). RESULTS: The basal count of 8x106 cfu decreased after treatments, the lowest count was 0.12% chlorhexidine with 1.07 cfu, followed by 100% acetic acid with 3.07 cfu and 50% acetic acid with 4.73 cfu. CONCLUSION: When comparing the concentrations of acetic acid and chlorhexidine, they did not show a statistically significant difference between each other (p=0.993); but when comparing them with the baseline count, it is observed that there is a statistically significant difference (p=0.000). Chlorhexidine 0.12% produces a greater effect, followed by acetic acid 100% and finally acetic acid 50%
Discipline: Estomatología
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Medicina Humana
Grade or title: Cirujano Dentista
Register date: 15-Oct-2020



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.