Citas bibligráficas
Velasco, E., (2023). La presunción relativa de verdad y la imposición de una multa en la conciliación extrajudicial [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/13471
Velasco, E., La presunción relativa de verdad y la imposición de una multa en la conciliación extrajudicial [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/13471
@misc{renati/372088,
title = "La presunción relativa de verdad y la imposición de una multa en la conciliación extrajudicial",
author = "Velasco Valdiviezo, Estephanie Tatiana",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2023"
}
Our thesis is entitled: The relative presumption of truth and the imposition of a fine in extrajudicial conciliation; and, in it we ask ourselves the following question: Why should the relative presumption of truth and the imposition of a fine, prescribed in the final part of article 15 of Law No. 26872, conciliation law, be repealed? In our research we set ourselves the following general objective: ““To make known why the relative presumption of truth and the imposition of a fine, prescribed in the final part of article 15 of Law No. 26872, conciliation law, must be repealed;““ and also the following specific objectives: Analyze the legal nature of extrajudicial conciliation as a conflict resolution mechanism in Peru; study the relative presumption of truth as a consequence of the inactive behavior of the party invited to conciliate and the defendant in the Peruvian legal system; propose the repeal of the final part of article 15 of Law No. 26872, conciliation law that regulates extrajudicial conciliation. Finally we arrive at the following main conclusion: ““The relative presumption of truth and the imposition of a fine, prescribed in the final part of article 15 of Law No. 26872, conciliation law, must be repealed, since said presumption is practically suppressed once, within the civil process, the defendant answers the claim; since here the special norm that governs the Civil process is the Civil Procedure Code; or, in any case, when said defendant does not answer the claim within the legal term and is therefore declared a rebel, the presumption contained in article 461 of the Civil Procedure Code will enter into consideration, if applicable, since as already it was said it is the special norm; so that relative presumption of truth would be absolutely absorbed by what is regulated in our adjective Civil Code”.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons