Citas bibligráficas
Agurto, L., Medina, L. (2024). La facturación electrónica y su incidencia en la determinación del impuesto general a las ventas de la empresa Distribuidora Ferretera Minera S&M E.I.R.L. Trujillo - 2021 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/27191
Agurto, L., Medina, L. La facturación electrónica y su incidencia en la determinación del impuesto general a las ventas de la empresa Distribuidora Ferretera Minera S&M E.I.R.L. Trujillo - 2021 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/27191
@misc{renati/371851,
title = "La facturación electrónica y su incidencia en la determinación del impuesto general a las ventas de la empresa Distribuidora Ferretera Minera S&M E.I.R.L. Trujillo - 2021",
author = "Medina Rodríguez, Luis",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2024"
}
The purpose of this investigation was to determine how electronic invoicing affects the determination of the general sales tax of the company Distribuidora Ferretera Minera S&M EIRL. Trujillo, 2021. The design was pre-experimental. The information was collected through the documentary analysis sheet authorized by the company, such as the sales sent and accepted by Sunat, those accepted with observation and those rejected, as well as the monthly declarations. The determination of the general sales tax was analyzed, evaluated and compared in relation to the invoices issued by the company in a physical and electronic way. The results obtained show that the company did not send electronic invoices within the established deadlines, to determine a tax to pay less than its obligations, altering the determination of the general sales tax, accumulating and using an undue tax credit. It was concluded that the determination of the general sales tax with and without electronic invoicing in hypothesis testing did not exist a significant difference because a value Z=0.776 was concluded, corresponding to a value P=0.221 and it was greater than 0.05; This non-significance is probably due to the small sample size n=12 months and the non- normality of the data
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons