Citas bibligráficas
Araoz, R., Ascue, K., Llerena, L., Ríos, J. (2018). Incumplimiento de plazos e incremento de costos en obras por administración directa en la ciudad del Cusco - caso de estudio: nueva sede institucional de la EPS SEDACUSCO [Trabajo de investigación, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/625280
Araoz, R., Ascue, K., Llerena, L., Ríos, J. Incumplimiento de plazos e incremento de costos en obras por administración directa en la ciudad del Cusco - caso de estudio: nueva sede institucional de la EPS SEDACUSCO [Trabajo de investigación]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/625280
@mastersthesis{renati/367938,
title = "Incumplimiento de plazos e incremento de costos en obras por administración directa en la ciudad del Cusco - caso de estudio: nueva sede institucional de la EPS SEDACUSCO",
author = "Ríos Rabelo, José Luis",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2018"
}
The present research work, seeks to implement the Risk Management System based on the PMBOK 5th Ed, using the Risky Project Professional Software to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative analysis of said risks in terms of costs and times, which allows EPS SEDACUSCO to improve its efficiency in the execution of its works. The problems that arise in works that are executed under the modality of Direct Administration, do not comply with the execution deadlines or with the original budget, which is why we resort to extensions of term and budget, which generates losses to the entity. From the conclusions, we can summarize in: In the pilot case of the new institutional headquarters, there is a budget at the Direct Cost of S/.10,601,438.00, with the risks identified, the new cost was increased by S/.2,964,154.46 which makes a total of S/.13`565,592.46, with an incidence percentage of + 27.95% and that would generate substantial losses to the EPS. The contractual term of the construction is 640 calendar days; from 01/05/2014 to 02/10/2016, with the risks that were identified, the new conclusion would be 1029 calendar days, with its new conclusion, on 03/10/2018, there being a difference of 389 calendar days, which it would be an extension of the term, having a percentage of incidence of + 60.78%, which would generate delays in the delivery of the project.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons