Bibliographic citations
Ramos, B., Córdova, A. (2015). Motivación y prisión preventiva como garantía de un debido proceso en el Corte Superior de Justicia de Loreto, durante el período 2011 - 2013 [Tesis, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana]. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/4247
Ramos, B., Córdova, A. Motivación y prisión preventiva como garantía de un debido proceso en el Corte Superior de Justicia de Loreto, durante el período 2011 - 2013 [Tesis]. : Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana; 2015. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/4247
@mastersthesis{renati/291705,
title = "Motivación y prisión preventiva como garantía de un debido proceso en el Corte Superior de Justicia de Loreto, durante el período 2011 - 2013",
author = "Córdova Soto, Alejandro",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana",
year = "2015"
}
The present investigation has for purpose to demonstrate that the dictation of preventive prison, in its great majority, affects the principle-guarantee of motivation of the judicial resolutions, the type of used investigation it was the causal one explanatory, the method was: descriptive, dogmatic, inductive, deductive, historical and analytic and the Design was: descriptive comparative, the obtained results respond to the population and proposed sample, the resolutions were obtained of the diverse judicial organs; as well as the surveys to professionals and right operators. The difficulties that we had went to the moment of the interviews with the denominated right operators, because many apologized of assisting us adducing reasons of diligences or time, reaching the following conclusions: To the being the personal freedom, one of human being more important fundamental rights, beside the life, their restriction had of supreme graveness, for what is necessary and important to surround it of the maximum juridical guarantees; but, of the analysis of the judicial resolutions and you interview carried out, it is verified that in the dictation of a preventive prison an appropriate and reinforced motivation is not applied, and it is that the adoption of a limitative measure of rights, especially, the one that restricts the person's freedom implies, the demand that recovers the procedural danger and that justifies the preventive prison, it should be serious and eminent, that is to say that implies it to sustain that said danger should be then of certain magnitude and entity in other words that it is objectively certain and the procedural danger, he/she should respond to what appears in those acted and not to be fruit of a mere suspicion or the magistrate's subjective presumptions.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License