Citas bibligráficas
Mejia, K., Alpaca, J. (2016). La prescriptibilidad del derecho de petición de herencia en el código civil peruano (Propuesta legislativa modificatoria del artículo 664 del Código Civil) [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/478
Mejia, K., Alpaca, J. La prescriptibilidad del derecho de petición de herencia en el código civil peruano (Propuesta legislativa modificatoria del artículo 664 del Código Civil) [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/478
@misc{renati/26929,
title = "La prescriptibilidad del derecho de petición de herencia en el código civil peruano (Propuesta legislativa modificatoria del artículo 664 del Código Civil)",
author = "Alpaca Kana, Juan Carlos",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2016"
}
This research study of the art interpretive analysis. 664 Peruvian CC, which part to establish that cases provided for in petitoria action are imprescriptible, it should be understood that the Non-referred to by this legal device to be understood, first it is not “statute“ or liberatory because the personal right as heir is perpetual, is not extinguished by the effect over time. Thus, after describing in detail the proposal in that legal precept, in that sense, it has been considered undoubtedly the enormous importance of this action, based on the right of everyone to have the rightful heritage and who, for various reasons it does not own, after a succession. But, I reiterate, beyond the importance of this action, which would correspond is ask ourselves whether anything could be interpreted that in the event that Article 664 of the CC had not indicated the applicability of the petitoria action of inheritance, such action imprescriptible would, moreover, that general rule of applicability is applied to all the cases provided for in art. 664 taking into account the existence of the right in each claim. Here it is also clear that, regardless of the severity of the controversial issue, the negative response is necessary, because outside of any legal consideration, we would have no absolutely compelling reason the applicability of such action, unless the law, as indeed , it has done- point their imprescriptible character. Then his imprescriptible not been specified in the law, we would have to resort to analyze which of the general limitation period established by Article 2001 of the Civil Code would apply, the latter for better protection of rights and legal certainty.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons