Bibliographic citations
Mozo, J., (2022). La falta de argumentación en los mecanismos procesales de nulidad, formulados por los litigantes en los procesos civiles tramitados en el Juzgado Civil Mixto de La Convención durante los años 2020-2021. [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/5105
Mozo, J., La falta de argumentación en los mecanismos procesales de nulidad, formulados por los litigantes en los procesos civiles tramitados en el Juzgado Civil Mixto de La Convención durante los años 2020-2021. []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/5105
@misc{renati/25953,
title = "La falta de argumentación en los mecanismos procesales de nulidad, formulados por los litigantes en los procesos civiles tramitados en el Juzgado Civil Mixto de La Convención durante los años 2020-2021.",
author = "Mozo Huaman, Jair Daniel",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2022"
}
The present investigation had as general objective: "Analyze the arguments presented by the litigants in the procedural mechanisms of nullity formulated in the civil processes in the Civil Court - Mixed of the Province of La Convencion between the years 2020-2021", being the objectives specific intended to describe and analyze the arguments put forward by the litigants in their annulments, it can be established that, in general, the procedural mechanisms of annulment are filed by the parties in civil judicial proceedings, without the correct application and invocation of the procedural rules provided for in the Civil Procedure Code. Taking into account that the procedural norm does not establish an express sanction as such when procedural annulments are formulated by the parties without any argumentation, it generates that the civil judicial processes tend to be unnecessarily delayed, because the normal procedure of the civil judicial process is hinders, which also generates a procedural burden in the Civil-Mixed Court of the Convention, being the object of this investigation what is detailed above. The research was non-experimental, qualitative in nature, with an ethnographic research design. After validating the general hypothesis and the specific hypotheses, the following recommendation was reached: "Recommend to the sponsoring lawyers of the parties immersed in a civil judicial process, to adequately argue their procedural mechanisms of nullity, as well as to carry out an adequate defense, complying with the legal parameters required in the Civil Procedure Code.”
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License